Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19455354›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2009

Molecular genetics of migraine.

Boukje de Vries, Rune R Frants, Michel D Ferrari, Arn M J M van den Maagdenberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Hemiplegic Migraine in Children and Adolescents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Towards Zebrafish Models of CNS Channelopathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Investigation ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boukje de VriesDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rune R Frants
Michel D Ferrari
Arn M J M van den Maagdenberg
Leiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is an episodic neurovascular disorder that is clinically divided into two main subtypes that are based on the absence or presence of an aura: migraine without aura (MO) and migraine with aura (MA). Current molecular genetic insight into the pathophysiology of migraine predominantly comes from studies of a rare monogenic subtype of migraine with aura called familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM). Three FHM genes have been identified, which all encode ion transporters, suggesting that disturbances in ion and neurotransmitter balances in the brain are responsible for this migraine type, and possibly the common forms of migraine. Cellular and animal models expressing FHM mutations hint toward neuronal hyperexcitability as the likely underlying disease mechanism. Additional molecular insight into the pathophysiology of migraine may come from other monogenic syndromes (for instance cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy, which is caused by NOTCH3 mutations), in which migraine is prominent. Investigating patients with common forms of migraine has had limited successes. Except for 5',10'-methylenetetrahydrolate reductase, an enzyme in folate metabolism, the large majority of reported genetic associations with candidate migraine genes have not been convincingly replicated. Genetic linkage studies using migraine subtypes as an end diagnosis did not yield gene variants thus far. Clinical heterogeneity in migraine diagnosis may have hampered the identification of such variants. Therefore, the recent introduction of more refined methods of phenotyping, such as latent-class analysis and trait component analysis, may be certainly helpful. Combining the new phenotyping methods with genome-wide association studies may be a successful strategy toward identification of migraine susceptibility genes. Likely the identification of reliable biomarkers for migraine diagnosing will make these efforts even more successful.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsCalcium ChannelsCalcium Channels, N-TypeChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2Codon, TerminatorCortical Spreading DepressionGenetic LinkageGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMigraine DisordersMigraine with AuraModels, GeneticATP1A2 protein, humanCACNA1A protein, humanCalcium ChannelsCalcium Channels, N-TypeCodon, TerminatorMonoamine OxidaseNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNerve Tissue ProteinsSCN1A protein, humanSodium ChannelsSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPase

Identifiers

PMID19455354
OpenAlexW2059818242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.