ArticlePediatric radiology2009
Sonographic findings following appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis in children.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about 'normal' local sonographic changes occurring in the postoperative period after an uneventful appendectomy.
objectiveTo analyse the local changes on US examination occurring after uneventful open (OA) or laparoscopic (LA) appendectomy in children with normal histology and with nonperforated acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND
methodsUS was prospectively performed in 82 children (54 boys and 28 girls) aged 1-16 years (mean 11.6+/-3.2 years), 3 days following LA (n=51, 62%) or OA (n=31, 38%) for nonperforated appendicitis. Multivariate analysis was performed using stepwise logistic regression, with the following starting variables: surgical technique, gender, pathological finding, appendix location, and histology.
resultsOf the 82 patients, 35 (42.7%) had postoperative pathological US findings such as peritoneal fluid, oedematous mesenteric fat and thickening of the bowel wall. While the overall incidence of pathological US findings between OA and LA groups was not significantly different, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that OA is associated with a reduction by a factor of 0.35 in the odds ratio of postoperative pathological US findings (P=0.007).
conclusionPathological US findings are common in children after appendectomy, particularly after LA. Awareness of these pathological findings might prevent unnecessary postoperative treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.