Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19454737›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2009

Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies.

M R Law, J K Morris, N J Wald

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,036 papers, 24 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,036citing papers in PubMed, 24 pooled it
103.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02919033 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Coordinated PCP-Cardiologist Telemedicine Model (PCTM) in China's Community Hypertension Care: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorXu LeiRan2016 to 2018Enrolled330ConditionsHypertensionArmsUsual care, Self-management, PCTM intervention
NCT04226157 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Home Blood Pressure Self-Management in Hypertensive Stroke Survivors: a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedStar Georgetown University HospitalRan2019 to 2021Enrolled32ConditionsIschemic Stroke, HypertensionArmsHome Blood Pressure Monitoring Device (Qardio Arm), Primary Care Provider Blood Pressure Management
NCT04841317 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Implementing a Mobile Technology-Based System for Physician-Directed Remote Management of Hypertension: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled31ConditionsHypertensionArmsMobile technology intervention
NCT06592209 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Body Electric: a Pragmatic Trial Evaluating Movement Breaks As a Public Health Strategy to Mitigate the Harms of Prolonged Sedentary Behavior

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled20,217ConditionsSedentary BehaviorArmsSedentary Breaks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,036 citing papers in PubMed, 24 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,765 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy and Safety of ARB-Based Combination Therapies for Treatment of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in adults 60 years or older.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Guideline
  12. Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

976 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M R LawCentre for Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ. m.r.law@qmul.ac.uk
J K Morris
N J Wald
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the quantitative efficacy of different classes of blood pressure lowering drugs in preventing coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, and who should receive treatment.

designMeta-analysis. Data source Medline (1966-2007). STUDY SELECTION: Randomised trials of blood pressure lowering drugs recording CHD events and strokes. 108 trials studied differences in blood pressure between study drug and placebo (or control group not receiving the study drug) ("blood pressure difference trials"), and 46 trials compared drugs ("drug comparison trials"). Seven trials with three randomised groups fell into both categories. The results were interpreted in the context of those expected from the largest published meta-analysis of cohort studies, totalling 958 000 people.

participants464 000 people defined into three mutually exclusive categories: participants with no history of vascular disease, a history of CHD, or a history of stroke.

resultsIn the blood pressure difference trials beta blockers had a special effect over and above that due to blood pressure reduction in preventing recurrent CHD events in people with a history of CHD: risk reduction 29% (95% confidence interval 22% to 34%) compared with 15% (11% to 19%) in trials of other drugs. The extra effect was limited to a few years after myocardial infarction, with a risk reduction of 31% compared with 13% in people with CHD with no recent infarct (P=0.04). In the other blood pressure difference trials (excluding CHD events in trials of beta blockers in people with CHD), there was a 22% reduction in CHD events (17% to 27%) and a 41% (33% to 48%) reduction in stroke for a blood pressure reduction of 10 mm Hg systolic or 5 mm Hg diastolic, similar to the reductions of 25% (CHD) and 36% (stroke) expected for the same difference in blood pressure from the cohort study meta-analysis, indicating that the benefit is explained by blood pressure reduction itself. The five main classes of blood pressure lowering drugs (thiazides, beta blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and calcium channel blockers) were similarly effective (within a few percentage points) in preventing CHD events and strokes, with the exception that calcium channel blockers had a greater preventive effect on stroke (relative risk 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.98). The percentage reductions in CHD events and stroke were similar in people with and without cardiovascular disease and regardless of blood pressure before treatment (down to 110 mm Hg systolic and 70 mm Hg diastolic). Combining our results with those from two other studies (the meta-analyses of blood pressure cohort studies and of trials determining the blood pressure lowering effects of drugs according to dose) showed that in people aged 60-69 with a diastolic blood pressure before treatment of 90 mm Hg, three drugs at half standard dose in combination reduced the risk of CHD by an estimated 46% and of stroke by 62%; one drug at standard dose had about half this effect. The present meta-analysis also showed that drugs other than calcium channel blockers (with the exception of non-cardioselective beta blockers) reduced the incidence of heart failure by 24% (19% to 28%) and calcium channel blockers by 19% (6% to 31%).

conclusionsWith the exception of the extra protective effect of beta blockers given shortly after a myocardial infarction and the minor additional effect of calcium channel blockers in preventing stroke, all the classes of blood pressure lowering drugs have a similar effect in reducing CHD events and stroke for a given reduction in blood pressure so excluding material pleiotropic effects. The proportional reduction in cardiovascular disease events was the same or similar regardless of pretreatment blood pressure and the presence or absence of existing cardiovascular disease. Guidelines on the use of blood pressure lowering drugs can be simplified so that drugs are offered to people with all levels of blood pressure. Our results indicate the importance of lowering blood pressure in everyone over a certain age, rather than measuring it in everyone and treating it in some.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCoronary DiseaseHumansHypertensionProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStrokeAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID19454737
PMCPMC2684577
OpenAlexW2054796764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.