Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19454021›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2009

Promoter analysis of macrophage- and tick cell-specific differentially expressed Ehrlichia chaffeensis p28-Omp genes.

Lalitha Peddireddi, Chuanmin Cheng, Roman R Ganta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evaluating EcxR for Its Possible Role inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Human ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lalitha PeddireddiDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA. lpeddire@vet.k-state.edu
Chuanmin Cheng
Roman R Ganta
Kansas State University · US

Funding

Vector and Host Contributions to the Regulation of E. Chaffeensis Gene ExpressionR01AI070908 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ROMAN R. GANTA · 2008 to 2026
$6.9M
Cellular Immunity Against Ehrlichia chaffeensisR01AI055052 · NIAID · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GANTA, ROMAN R. · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
Vector and Host Contributions to the Regulation of E. chaffeensis Gene ExpressionR56AI070908 · NIAID · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GANTA, ROMAN R. · 2013 to 2013
$426k
NIAID NIH HHS AI055052NIAID NIH HHS AI070908NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI070908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEhrlichia chaffeensis is a rickettsial agent responsible for an emerging tick-borne illness, human monocytic ehrlichiosis. Recently, we reported that E. chaffeensis protein expression is influenced by macrophage and tick cell environments. We also demonstrated that host response differs considerably for macrophage and tick cell-derived bacteria with delayed clearance of the pathogen originating from tick cells.

resultsIn this study, we mapped differences in the promoter regions of two genes of p28-Omp locus, genes 14 and 19, whose expression is influenced by macrophage and tick cell environments. Primer extension and quantitative RT-PCR analysis were performed to map transcription start sites and to demonstrate that E. chaffeensis regulates transcription in a host cell-specific manner. Promoter regions of genes 14 and 19 were evaluated to map differences in gene expression and to locate RNA polymerase binding sites.

conclusionRNA analysis and promoter deletion analysis aided in identifying differences in transcription, DNA sequences that influenced promoter activity and RNA polymerase binding regions. This is the first description of a transcriptional machinery of E. chaffeensis. In the absence of available genetic manipulation systems, the promoter analysis described in this study can serve as a novel molecular tool for mapping the molecular basis for gene expression differences in E. chaffeensis and other related pathogens belonging to the Anaplasmataceae family.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBase SequenceCell LineChromosome MappingDogsEhrlichia chaffeensisGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, BacterialMacrophagesMolecular Sequence DataRNA, BacterialSpecies SpecificityTicksTranscription, GeneticBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID19454021
PMCPMC2694197
OpenAlexW1993130559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.