ArticleCritical care (London, England)2009
Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Observational Study Comparing NICOM-Cheetah Versus Flotrac-Vigileo for Cardiac Output Monitoring in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.
Comparison of Transthoracic Electrical Bioimpedance and Pulse Contour Analysis in Renal Transplantation Patients: Analysis of Intraoperative Cardiac Output, Systemic Vascular Resistant and Stroke Volume Variation
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- [Meta-analyses on measurement precision of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies in adults].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Pooled it
- Does stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2016Pooled it
- Intravenous thiamine is associated with increased oxygen consumption in critically ill patients with preserved cardiac index.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2014Trial
- Cardiac index assessment using bioreactance in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery in ovarian carcinoma.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2013Trial
- Neonatal sepsis and cardiovascular dysfunction II: assessment.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Agreement between cardiac output estimation with a wireless, wearable pulse decomposition analysis device and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Article
- Non-invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in infants with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022Observational
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonographic Respiratory Variation in the Inferior Vena Cava, Subclavian Vein, Internal Jugular Vein, and Femoral Vein Diameter to Predict Fluid Responsiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened.Annals of intensive care · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular changes during peanut-induced allergic reactions in human subjects.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021Observational
- Agreement of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Monitoring With Thermodilution in Healthy Standing Horses.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- A Physiologic Approach to Hemodynamic Monitoring and Optimizing Oxygen Delivery in Shock Resuscitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Use of a Non-invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in a Patient with Low-output Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020Article
- Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study (EDNICO): an accuracy study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020Observational
- Bioreactance-Based Noninvasive Fluid Responsiveness and Cardiac Output Monitoring: A Pilot Study in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Literature Review.Critical care research and practice · 2020Article
- Ultrasound Assessment of the Change in Carotid Corrected Flow Time in Fluid Responsiveness in Undifferentiated Shock.Critical care medicine · 2018Article
- Cardiac output monitoring: A comparative prospective observational study of the conventional cardiac output monitor Vigileo™ and the new smartphone-based application Capstesia™.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2018Article
- Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study was designed to compare the clinical acceptability of two cardiac output (CO) monitoring systems: a pulse wave contour-based system (FloTrac-Vigileo) and a bioreactance-based system (NICOM), using continuous thermodilution (PAC-CCO) as a reference method.
methodsConsecutive patients, requiring PAC-CCO monitoring following cardiac surgery, were also monitored by the two other devices. CO values obtained simultaneously by the three systems were recorded continuously on a minute-by-minute basis.
resultsContinuous recording was performed on 29 patients, providing 12,099 simultaneous measurements for each device (417 +/- 107 per patient). In stable conditions, correlations of NICOM and Vigileo with PAC-CCO were 0.77 and 0.69, respectively. The bias was -0.01 +/- 0.84 for NICOM and -0.01 +/- 0.81 for Vigileo (NS). NICOM relative error was less than 30% in 94% of the patients and less than 20% in 79% vs. 91% and 79% for the Vigileo, respectively (NS). The variability of measurements around the trend line (precision) was not different between the three methods: 8 +/- 3%, 8 +/- 4% and 8 +/- 3% for PAC-CCO, NICOM and Vigileo, respectively. CO changes were 7.2 minutes faster with Vigileo and 6.9 minutes faster with NICOM (P < 0.05 both systems vs. PAC-CCO, NS). Amplitude of changes was not significantly different than thermodilution. Finally, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting significant CO changes were 0.91 and 0.95 respectively for the NICOM and 0.86 and 0.92 respectively for the Vigileo.
conclusionThis study showed that the NICOM and Vigileo devices have similar monitoring capabilities in post-operative cardiac surgery patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.