Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19451287›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009

Identifying exposure targets for treatment of staphylococcal pneumonia with ceftobiprole.

Keith A Rodvold, David P Nicolau, Thomas P Lodise, Mohammed Khashab, Gary J Noel, James B Kahn, Mark Gotfried, Sara A Murray, Susan Nicholson, Somvadee Laohavaleeson and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lessons Are Still Being Learned about Intrapulmonary Antibiotic Concentrations.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Structural chemistry · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Ceftobiprole for the treatment of pneumonia.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Review
  19. Ceftobiprole: pharmacokinetics and PK/PD profile.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Keith A RodvoldCollege of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David P Nicolau
Thomas P Lodise
Mohammed Khashab
Gary J Noel
James B Kahn
Mark Gotfried
Sara A Murray
Susan Nicholson
Somvadee Laohavaleeson
Pamela R Tessier
G L Drusano
Albany Research Institute · USHartford Hospital · USJanssen Scientific Affairs (United States)University of Arizona · USIllinois College · USJohnson & Johnson (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin with potent activity against methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In order to treat patients with severe staphylococcal pneumonia, it is important to understand the drug exposure required to mediate the killing of multiple log(10) cells in a preclinical-infection model. We measured drug exposure in terms of the percentage of penetration of the drug into epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and in terms of the time for which the drug concentration was above the MIC (time>MIC) in plasma and ELF. In a murine model of staphylococcal pneumonia, we demonstrated that ceftobiprole penetrated into ELF from the plasma at a median level of nearly 69% (25th to 75th percentile range, 25 to 187%), as indexed to the ratio of values for the area under the concentration-time curve in ELF and plasma. The total-drug times>MIC in ELF that were required to kill 1 log(10) and 2 log(10) CFU/g of lung tissue were 15% and 25% of the dosing interval. We also examined the penetration of ELF by ceftobiprole in volunteers, demonstrating mean and median penetration percentages of 25.5% and 15.3%, respectively (25th to 75th percentile range, 8 to 30%). Attainment rates were calculated for kill targets of 1 log(10) and 2 log(10) CFU/g, taken from the murine model, but using the volunteer ceftobiprole ELF penetration data. The standard dose for ceftobiprole is 0.5 g every 8 h as a 2-h infusion. The attainment rates remained above 90% for 1-log(10) and 2-log(10) CFU/g kill targets at MICs of 1 and 0.5 mg/liter, respectively. Taking the expectation over the distribution of ceftobiprole MICs for 4,958 MRSA isolates showed an overall target attainment of 85.6% for a 1-log(10) CFU/g kill and 79.7% for a 2-log(10) CFU/g kill. It is important to derive exposure targets in preclinical-infection models of the infection site so that these targets can be explored in clinical trials in order to optimize the probability of a good clinical outcome.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCephalosporinsDisease Models, AnimalEpitheliumFemaleHumansMiceMonte Carlo MethodPneumonia, StaphylococcalAnti-Bacterial AgentsceftobiproleCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID19451287
PMCPMC2715607
OpenAlexW2032422158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.