Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19451280›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009

Effects of azithromycin in combination with vancomycin, daptomycin, fosfomycin, tigecycline, and ceftriaxone on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

Elisabeth Presterl, Stefan Hajdu, Andrea M Lassnigg, Alexander M Hirschl, Johannes Holinka, Wolfgang Graninger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Adjuvant antibiotic-loaded bone cement: Concerns with current use and research to make it work.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Phenotypic Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  7. The role of fosfomycin in osteoarticular infection.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Fosfomycin.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elisabeth PresterlDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Vienna, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. elisabeth.presterl@meduniwien.ac.at
Stefan Hajdu
Andrea M Lassnigg
Alexander M Hirschl
Johannes Holinka
Wolfgang Graninger
Office of Infectious Diseases · USInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcal biofilms on surgical implants are the underlying cause of a lack of response to antimicrobial treatment. We investigated the effects of vancomycin (VAN), daptomycin (DAP), fosfomycin (FOS), tigecycline (TGC), and ceftriaxone (CRX), alone and in combination with azithromycin (AZI), on established biofilms of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biofilms were studied using the static microtiter plate model with established S. epidermidis biofilms, with an initial inoculum of 10(6)/ml in 96-well polystyrene flat-bottom microtiter plates. Biofilms were inoculated with VAN, DAP, FOS, TGC, or CRX at two concentrations, alone or in combination with AZI (2, 512, or 1,024 mg/liter). To assess the reduction in biomass, the optical density ratio (ODr), calculated as (optical density [OD] of the treated biofilm)/(OD of the untreated biofilm, taken as 1), was used. For antibacterial efficacy, the viable bacterial count was used. Reductions in the biofilm ODr were observed for VAN (15 and 40 mg/liter) and FOS (200 mg/liter) only (ODr [mean +/- standard deviation] for VAN at 15 and 40 mg/liter, 0.77 +/- 0.32 and 0.8 +/- 0.35, respectively; ODr for FOS at 200 mg/liter, 0.78 +/- 0.26; P < 0.05), but not for DAP (2 and 5 mg/liter), TGC (0.2 and 2 mg/liter), or CRX (600 and 2,400 mg/liter). The addition of AZI had no further effect on the ODr, but a significant reduction of bacterial growth was achieved with high doses of AZI plus TGC or AZI plus CRX (a 3-log count reduction for AZI at 1,024 mg/liter plus CRX at 600 mg/liter and for AZI at 512 or 1,024 mg/liter plus CRX at 2,400 mg/liter; a 2-log count reduction for AZI at 512 or 1,024 mg/liter plus TGC at 2 mg/liter [P < 0.05]). No significant reduction in bacterial growth was observed for FOS (50 and 200 mg/liter), DAP (2 and 5 mg/liter), or TGC (0.2 mg/liter) in combination with AZI. None of the antibiotics at either concentration reduced the bacterial count of the biofilms when used alone. Thus, the use of a combination of AZI plus TGC, FOS, or CRX at high concentrations has little effect on biofilm density but significantly reduces bacterial growth.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCeftriaxoneDaptomycinMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMinocyclineStaphylococcus epidermidisTigecyclineVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneDaptomycinMinocyclineTigecyclineVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID19451280
PMCPMC2715620
OpenAlexW2116679384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.