Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19450631›Full record

ArticleVaccine2009

Harnessing the unique local immunostimulatory properties of modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus to generate superior tumor-specific immune responses and antitumor activity in a diversified prime and boost vaccine regimen.

James W Hodge, Jack Higgins, Jeffrey Schlom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phase I Study of a Poxviral TRICOM-Based Vaccine Directed Against the Transcription Factor Brachyury.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Therapeutic cancer vaccines.Advances in cancer research · 2014
    Review
  7. Enhancing poxvirus vectors vaccine immunogenicity.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Oncolytic virus therapy for cancer.Oncolytic virotherapy · 2013
    Review
  10. Therapeutic cancer vaccines: current status and moving forward.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2012
    Review
  11. Poxviral vectors for cancer immunotherapy.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2012
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James W HodgeLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Jack Higgins
Jeffrey Schlom
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Strategies for Cancer Vaccine Development: Preclinical StudiesZIABC010944 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHLOM, JEFFREY · 2009 to 2025
$26.6M
Vaccine and Drug Combination Therapy for Human CancersZIABC010661 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HODGE, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$11.2M
Vaccine and Drug Combination Therapy for Human CancersZ01BC010661 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HODGE, JAMES W · 2005 to 2008
$1.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010661NCI NIH HHS Z01 BC010661-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant poxviruses expressing tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) are currently being evaluated in clinical trials as an approach to treat various cancers. We have previously generated poxviral vectors expressing a TAA and a TRIad of COstimulatory Molecules (B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3; TRICOM) as transgenes, including replication competent recombinant vaccinia (rV) or replication-defective modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA), to prime tumor-specific immune responses, and a replication-defective recombinant fowlpox (rF) to boost these responses. MVA is a potentially safer, replication-defective form of vaccinia virus with unique immunostimulatory properties that could make it a superior priming vaccine. Here, an MVA vector encoding a tumor antigen (CEA) and TRICOM was utilized (rMVA). A single rMVA-CEA/TRICOM vaccination induced greater expression of several serum cytokines associated with enhanced T-cell immunity than that seen with vaccinia. We hypothesized that this effect might "precondition" the vaccination site for a more effective boost. An rMVA-CEA/TRICOM prime followed 7 days later (but not 30 days later) by an rF-CEA/TRICOM boost at the same injection site (but not at a distal site) induced more potent CEA-specific T-cell responses, and superior CEA-specific immunity and antitumor activity, than rV-CEA/TRICOM followed by rF-CEA/TRICOM. This preconditioning effect was also observed using a heterologous antigen model, where priming with rMVA-CEA/TRICOM followed 7 days later by rF-LacZ/TRICOM enhanced beta-gal-specific immunity compared to rF-LacZ/TRICOM only. The studies reported here show for the first time that priming with rMVA followed 7 days later by an rF boost at the same injection site, versus a distal site, generates superior tumor-specific immunity and antitumor activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesCarcinoembryonic AntigenCytokinesFemaleImmunization, SecondaryMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeoplasms, ExperimentalTime FactorsT-LymphocytesVaccines, SyntheticVaccinia virusCancer VaccinesCarcinoembryonic AntigenCytokinesrF-TRICOM vaccineVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID19450631
PMCPMC3518379
OpenAlexW1996464330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.