ArticleJournal of molecular biology2009
Chromatin remodelers act globally, sequence positions nucleosomes locally.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- ATP-dependent remodeling of chromatin condensates reveals distinct mesoscale outcomes.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Energy-driven genome regulation by ATP-dependent chromatin remodellers.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024Review
- Nucleosome density shapes kilobase-scale regulation by a mammalian chromatin remodeler.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023Article
- Nucleosome Remodeling at the YeastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Remodeler Catalyzed Nucleosome Repositioning: Influence of Structure and Stability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Site-directed targeting of transcriptional activation-associated proteins to repressed chromatin restores CRISPR activity.APL bioengineering · 2020Article
- The implication of DNA bending energy for nucleosome positioning and sliding.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Major Determinants of Nucleosome Positioning.Biophysical journal · 2018Review
- The Yeast INO80 Complex Operates as a Tunable DNA Length-Sensitive Switch to Regulate Nucleosome Sliding.Molecular cell · 2018Article
- The Sequence of Nucleosomal DNA Modulates Sliding by the Chd1 Chromatin Remodeler.Journal of molecular biology · 2017Article
- Mechanisms of ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Motors.Annual review of biophysics · 2016Review
- Article
- Article
- Computational study of remodeling in a nucleosomal array.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2015Article
- Review
- Nucleosome positioning in yeasts: methods, maps, and mechanisms.Chromosoma · 2015Review
- ISWI remodels nucleosomes through a random walk.Biochemistry · 2014Article
- The RSC chromatin remodeling complex has a crucial role in the complete remodeler set for yeast PHO5 promoter opening.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Regulation of ISWI chromatin remodelling activity.Chromosoma · 2014Review
- SPBP is a sulforaphane induced transcriptional coactivator of NRF2 regulating expression of the autophagy receptor p62/SQSTM1.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The precise placement of nucleosomes has large regulatory effects on gene expression. Recent work suggests that nucleosome placement is regulated in part by the affinity of the underlying DNA sequence for the histone octamer. Nucleosome locations are also regulated by several different ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes. This raises the question of whether DNA sequence influences the activity of chromatin remodeling enzymes. DNA sequence could most simply regulate nucleosome remodeling through its effect on nucleosome stability. In such a model, unstable nucleosomes would be remodeled faster than stable nucleosomes. It is also possible that certain DNA elements could regulate remodeling by inhibiting the interaction of nucleosomes with the remodeling enzyme. A third possibility is that DNA sequence could regulate the outcome of remodeling by influencing how reaction intermediates collapse into a particular set of stable nucleosomal positions. Here we dissect the contribution from these potential mechanisms to the activities of yeast RSC and human ACF, which are representative members of two major classes of remodeling complexes. We find that varying the histone-DNA affinity over 3 orders of magnitude has negligible effects on the rates of nucleosome remodeling and ATP hydrolysis by these two enzymes. This suggests that the rate-limiting step for nucleosome remodeling may not involve the disruption of histone-DNA contacts. We further find that a specific curved DNA element previously hypothesized to inhibit ACF activity does not inhibit substrate binding or remodeling by ACF. The element, however, does influence the distribution of nucleosome positions generated by ACF. Our data support a model in which remodeling enzymes move nucleosomes to new locations by a general sequence-independent mechanism. However, consequent to the rate-limiting remodeling step, the local DNA sequence promotes a collapse of remodeling intermediates into highly resolved positions that are dictated by thermodynamic differences between adjacent positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.