ArticleBiophysical journal2009
A new computational approach for mechanical folding kinetics of RNA hairpins.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kinetic Mechanism of RNA Helix-Terminal Basepairing-A Kinetic Minima Network Analysis.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Predicting Cotranscriptional Folding Kinetics For Riboswitch.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2018Article
- Mimicking Ribosomal Unfolding of RNA Pseudoknot in a Protein Channel.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015Article
- Computational modeling of RNA 3D structures, with the aid of experimental restraints.RNA biology · 2014Review
- Rational truncation of an RNA aptamer to prostate-specific membrane antigen using computational structural modeling.Nucleic acid therapeutics · 2011Article
- RNA and protein 3D structure modeling: similarities and differences.Journal of molecular modeling · 2011Review
- Folding kinetics for the conformational switch between alternative RNA structures.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Based on an ensemble of kinetically accessible conformations, we propose a new analytical model for RNA folding kinetics. The model gives populational kinetics, kinetic rates, transition states, and pathways from the rate matrix. Applications of the new kinetic model to mechanical folding of RNA hairpins such as trans-activation-responsive RNA reveal distinct kinetic behaviors in different force regimes, from zero force to forces much stronger than the critical force for the folding-unfolding transition. In the absence of force or a low force, folding can be initiated (nucleated) at any position by forming the first base stack and there exist many pathways for the folding process. In contrast, for a higher force, the folding/unfolding would predominantly proceed along a single zipping/unzipping pathway. Studies for different hairpin-forming sequences indicate that depending on the nucleotide sequence, a kinetic intermediate can emerge in the low force regime but disappear in high force regime, and a new kinetic intermediate, which is absent in the low and high force regimes, can emerge in the medium force range. Variations of the force lead to changes in folding cooperativity and rate-limiting steps. The predicted network of pathways for trans-activation-responsive RNA suggests two parallel dominant pathways. The rate-limiting folding steps (at f = 8 pN) are the formation of specific basepairs that are 2-4 basepairs away from the loop. At a higher force (f = 11 pN), the folding rate is controlled by the formation of the bulge loop. The predicted rates and transition states are in good agreement with the experimental data for a broad force regime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.