Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19450468›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2009

Effect of voltage sensitive fluorescent proteins on neuronal excitability.

Walther Akemann, Alicia Lundby, Hiroki Mutoh, Thomas Knöpfel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Beyond a Transmission Cable-New Technologies to Reveal the Richness in Axonal Electrophysiology.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Brighten the Future: Photobiomodulation and Optogenetics.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Label-free optical detection of bioelectric potentials using electrochromic thin films.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Hysteretic Behavior in Voltage-Gated Channels.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Differential Inhibition of Neuronal Sodium Channel Subtypes by the General Anesthetic Isoflurane.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Hysteresis in voltage-gated channels.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators: Opportunities and Challenges.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Walther AkemannLaboratory for Neuronal Circuit Dynamics, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako-City, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Alicia Lundby
Hiroki Mutoh
Thomas Knöpfel
RIKEN Center for Brain Science · JPDanish National Research Foundation · DK

Funding

Scan of Protein Space for Optical Voltage ProbesU24NS057631 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2007 to 2011
$5.2M
NINDS NIH HHS NS057631NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS057631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescent protein voltage sensors are recombinant proteins that are designed as genetically encoded cellular probes of membrane potential using mechanisms of voltage-dependent modulation of fluorescence. Several such proteins, including VSFP2.3 and VSFP3.1, were recently reported with reliable function in mammalian cells. They were designed as molecular fusions of the voltage sensor of Ciona intestinalis voltage sensor containing phosphatase with a fluorescence reporter domain. Expression of these proteins in cell membranes is accompanied by additional dynamic membrane capacitance, or "sensing capacitance", with feedback effect on the native electro-responsiveness of targeted cells. We used recordings of sensing currents and fluorescence responses of VSFP2.3 and of VSFP3.1 to derive kinetic models of the voltage-dependent signaling of these proteins. Using computational neuron simulations, we quantitatively investigated the perturbing effects of sensing capacitance on the input/output relationship in two central neuron models, a cerebellar Purkinje and a layer 5 pyramidal neuron. Probe-induced sensing capacitance manifested as time shifts of action potentials and increased synaptic input thresholds for somatic action potential initiation with linear dependence on the membrane density of the probe. Whereas the fluorescence signal/noise grows with the square root of the surface density of the probe, the growth of sensing capacitance is linear. We analyzed the trade-off between minimization of sensing capacitance and signal/noise of the optical read-out depending on kinetic properties and cellular distribution of the probe. The simulation results suggest ways to reduce capacitive effects at a given level of signal/noise. Yet, the simulations indicate that significant improvement of existing probes will still be required to report action potentials in individual neurons in mammalian brain tissue in single trials.

Indexed as

Electric ConductivityCell MembraneComputer SimulationElectric CapacitanceFluorescenceGene Expression RegulationLuminescent ProteinsModels, BiologicalNeuronsPurkinje CellsSomatosensory CortexLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19450468
PMCPMC2712148
OpenAlexW1999590616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.