ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2009
Comparison of migration behavior between single and dual lag screw implants for intertrochanteric fracture fixation.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of integrated dual-lag screw versus single lag screw cephalomedullary nails for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- Biomechanical comparison of the bone-screw-fastener to conventional cortical buttress screw in a simulated ex vivo model of equine midbody proximal sesamoid bone fracture repair.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2026Article
- Independent Risk Factors for Lag Screw Cut-Out: The Role of Open Reduction in Intertrochanteric Fracture Fixation With the Proximal Femoral Nail.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Torsional stability of fixation methods in basicervical femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Age-Related Dysfunction in Balance: A Comprehensive Review of Causes, Consequences, and Interventions.Aging and disease · 2024Review
- The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- What is the most fixable intramedullary implant for basicervical fracture and transcervical shear fracture? - A finite element study.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Article
- Biomechanical study on the stability and strain conduction of intertrochanteric fracture fixed with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus triangular supporting intramedullary nail.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Higher stability and more predictive fixation with the Femoral Neck System versus Hansson Pins in femoral neck fractures Pauwels II.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2020Article
- Article
- Screw-blade fixation systems in Pauwels three femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical evaluation.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- [The rotationally stable screw-anchor with trochanteric stabilizing plate (RoSA/TSP) : First results in unstable trochanteric femur fractures].Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Article
- Dual head screw hip nailing for trochanteric fractures.SICOT-J · 2017Article
- Article
- Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2016Review
- Load distribution between cephalic screws in a dual lag screw trochanteric nail.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2016Article
- Clinical and functional outcomes of internal fixation with intertrochanteric antegrade nail in older patients with proximal extracapsular femoral fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2014Article
- Is tip apex distance as important as we think? A biomechanical study examining optimal lag screw placement.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2014Article
- A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures.International orthopaedics · 2013Article
- Intertrochanteric fractures: comparison between two different locking nails.International orthopaedics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLag screw cut-out failure following fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in osteoporotic bone remains an unsolved challenge. This study tested if resistance to cut-out failure can be improved by using a dual lag screw implant in place of a single lag screw implant. Migration behavior and cut-out resistance of a single and a dual lag screw implant were comparatively evaluated in surrogate specimens using an established laboratory model of hip screw cut-out failure.
methodsFive dual lag screw implants (Endovis, Citieffe) and five single lag screw implants (DHS, Synthes) were tested in the Hip Implant Performance Simulator (HIPS) of the Legacy Biomechanics Laboratory. This model simulated osteoporotic bone, an unstable fracture, and biaxial rocking motion representative of hip loading during normal gait. All constructs were loaded up to 20,000 cycles of 1.45 kN peak magnitude under biaxial rocking motion. The migration kinematics was continuously monitored with 6-degrees of freedom motion tracking system and the number of cycles to implant cut-out was recorded.
resultsThe dual lag screw implant exhibited significantly less migration and sustained more loading cycles in comparison to the DHS single lag screw. All DHS constructs failed before 20,000 cycles, on average at 6,638 +/- 2,837 cycles either by cut-out or permanent screw bending. At failure, DHS constructs exhibited 10.8 +/- 2.3 degrees varus collapse and 15.5 +/- 9.5 degrees rotation around the lag screw axis. Four out of five dual screws constructs sustained 20,000 loading cycles. One dual screw specimens sustained cut-out by medial migration of the distal screw after 10,054 cycles. At test end, varus collapse and neck rotation in dual screws implants advanced to 3.7 +/- 1.7 degrees and 1.6 +/- 1.0 degrees , respectively.
conclusionThe single and double lag screw implants demonstrated a significantly different migration resistance in surrogate specimens under gait loading simulation with the HIPS model. In this model, the double screw construct provided significantly greater resistance against varus collapse and neck rotation in comparison to a standard DHS lag screw implant.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.