Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19450271›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009

Global optimal eBURST analysis of multilocus typing data using a graphic matroid approach.

Alexandre P Francisco, Miguel Bugalho, Mário Ramirez, João A Carriço

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 345 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
345citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

345 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Accurately IdentifyingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic and patient epidemiology ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genomic epidemiology of carbapenemase-producingMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2026
    Article
  17. Whole-genome and pan-genome analyses reveal genomic differences among nontypeableFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  18. Genetic characterization of gut-associatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  19. eLife · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

285 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandre P FranciscoInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores - ID em Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal. aplf@kdbio.inesc-id.pt
Miguel Bugalho
Mário Ramirez
João A Carriço

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) is a frequently used typing method for the analysis of the clonal relationships among strains of several clinically relevant microbial species. MLST is based on the sequence of housekeeping genes that result in each strain having a distinct numerical allelic profile, which is abbreviated to a unique identifier: the sequence type (ST). The relatedness between two strains can then be inferred by the differences between allelic profiles. For a more comprehensive analysis of the possible patterns of evolutionary descent, a set of rules were proposed and implemented in the eBURST algorithm. These rules allow the division of a data set into several clusters of related strains, dubbed clonal complexes, by implementing a simple model of clonal expansion and diversification. Within each clonal complex, the rules identify which links between STs correspond to the most probable pattern of descent. However, the eBURST algorithm is not globally optimized, which can result in links, within the clonal complexes, that violate the rules proposed.

resultsHere, we present a globally optimized implementation of the eBURST algorithm - goeBURST. The search for a global optimal solution led to the formalization of the problem as a graphic matroid, for which greedy algorithms that provide an optimal solution exist. Several public data sets of MLST data were tested and differences between the two implementations were found and are discussed for five bacterial species: Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Burkholderia pseudomallei, Campylobacter jejuni and Neisseria spp.. A novel feature implemented in goeBURST is the representation of the level of tiebreak rule reached before deciding if a link should be drawn, which can used to visually evaluate the reliability of the represented hypothetical pattern of descent.

conclusiongoeBURST is a globally optimized implementation of the eBURST algorithm, that identifies alternative patterns of descent for several bacterial species. Furthermore, the algorithm can be applied to any multilocus typing data based on the number of differences between numeric profiles. A software implementation is available at http://goeBURST.phyloviz.net.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisSoftwareAlgorithmsBacteriaDatabases, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGenes, BacterialGenomicsModels, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID19450271
PMCPMC2705362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.