Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19450038›Full record

Trial reportHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2009

Relationships between social norms, social network characteristics, and HIV risk behaviors in Thailand and the United States.

Carl Latkin, Deborah Donnell, David D Celentano, Apinun Aramrattna, Ting-Yuan Liu, Tasanai Vongchak, Kanokporn Wiboonnatakul, Annet Davis-Vogel, David Metzger

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adherence to Mammography and Pap Screening Guidelines Among Medically Underserved Women: the Role of Family Structures and Network-Level Behaviors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Carl LatkinDepartment of Health, John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. clatkin@jhsph.edu
Deborah Donnell
David D Celentano
Apinun Aramrattna
Ting-Yuan Liu
Tasanai Vongchak
Kanokporn Wiboonnatakul
Annet Davis-Vogel
David Metzger
Chiang Mai University · THCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

HIV PREVENTION TRIALS NETWORK LEADERSHIP GROUPU01AI046749 · NIAID · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI CATES, WILLARD · 1999 to 2005
$73.5M
HIV PREVENTION TRIALS NETWORK LEADERSHIP GROUPU01AI046702 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI FLEMING, THOMAS R · 2000 to 2005
$49.5M
HIV PREVENTION TRIAL UNITU01AI048014 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI METZGER, DAVID S · 2000 to 2006
$20.9M
HIV PREVENTION TRIALS UNIT-THAILANDU01AI047984 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CELENTANO, DAVID D. · 2000 to 2006
$9.7M
A Network & Dyad HIV Prevention Intervention for Intravenous Drug UserR01DA016555 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LATKIN, CARL A · 2003 to 2007
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI046702NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI046749NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI047984NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI048014NIAID NIH HHS U01-AI-46702NIAID NIH HHS U01-AI-46749NIAID NIH HHS U01-AI-47984NIAID NIH HHS U01-AI-48014NIDA NIH HHS DA016555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSocial norms have been associated with a wide range of health behaviors. In this study, the authors examined whether the social norms of HIV risk behaviors are clustered within social networks and whether the norms of network members are linked to the risk behaviors of their social network members.

designData were collected from the baseline assessment of 354 networks with 933 participants in a network-oriented HIV prevention intervention targeting injection drug users in Philadelphia, United States, and Chiang Mai, Thailand.

main outcome measuresFour descriptive HIV risk norms of sharing needles, cookers, and cotton and front- or back-loading among friends who inject were assessed.

resultsThree of 4 injection risk norms (sharing needle, cookers, and cotton) were found to be significantly clustered. In Philadelphia, 1 network member's (the index participant) norms of sharing needles and front- or back-loading were found to be significantly associated with the network members' risk behaviors, and the norm of sharing cotton was marginally associated.

conclusionThe results of this study suggest that among injection drug users, social norms are clustered within networks; social networks are a meaningful level of analyses for understanding how social norms lead to risk behaviors, providing important data for intervening to reduce injection-related HIV risks.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonDeveloping CountriesRisk-TakingSocial SupportSocial ValuesAdolescentAdultCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeedle SharingPhiladelphia

Identifiers

PMID19450038
PMCPMC2799116
OpenAlexW1994333150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.