ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2009
A prospective, longitudinal study of the impact of GJB2/GJB6 genetic testing on the beliefs and attitudes of parents of deaf and hard-of-hearing infants.
Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of sample type on genetic testing completion in pediatric congenital hearing loss patients.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Parental knowledge and attitudes toward genetic counseling and childhood genetic testing for congenital anomalies in Qatar.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Approach and solutions to congenital hearing impairment in Cameroon: perspective of hearing professionals.Tropical medicine and health · 2022Article
- Genetic and Non-genetic Workup for Pediatric Congenital Hearing Loss.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- Challenges to effective and autonomous genetic testing and counseling for ethno-cultural minorities: a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- A proposal for comprehensive newborn hearing screening to improve identification of deaf and hard-of-hearing children.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- Diagnostic exome sequencing in children: A survey of parental understanding, experience and psychological impact.Clinical genetics · 2018Article
- Opinions of hearing parents about the causes of hearing impairment of their children with biallelic GJB2 mutations.Journal of community genetics · 2017Article
- Reprogenetics, Genetic Tools and Reproductive Risk: Attitudes and Understanding Among Ethnic Groups in Israel.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Perception of Genetic Testing for Deafness and Factors Associated with Interest in Genetic Testing Among Deaf People in a Selected Population in Sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of genetic counseling · 2015Article
- Common genes for non-syndromic deafness are uncommon in sub-Saharan Africa: a report from Nigeria.International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2014Article
- Article
- Non-syndromic sensorineural prelingual deafness: the importance of genetic counseling in demystifying parents' beliefs about the cause of their children's deafness.Journal of genetic counseling · 2013Article
- Effect of pre-test genetic counseling for deaf adults on knowledge of genetic testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2012Article
- Prevalence of genetic testing in CHARGE syndrome.Journal of genetic counseling · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There are limited data on the impact of incorporating genetic counseling and testing into the newborn hearing screening process. We report on results from a prospective, longitudinal study to determine the impact of genetic counseling and GJB2/GJB6 genetic testing on parental knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about genetic testing. One hundred thirty culturally hearing parents of 93 deaf or hard-of-hearing children ages 0-3 years primarily identified through newborn hearing screening received pre- and post-test genetic counseling for GJB2 and GJB6. Parents completed questionnaires following pre-test counseling, and 1- and 6-month post-test result disclosure. Results indicate that following pre-test counseling all parents perceived benefits to genetic testing. While parents who received positive results continued to perceive benefits from testing, perceived benefit declined among parents who received inconclusive or negative results. Parents did not perceive genetic testing as harmful following pre-test counseling or receipt of test results. Parents who received positive test results performed better in understanding recurrence and causation of their child's deafness and indicated greater interest in prenatal genetic testing than those who received inconclusive or negative test results. Parents felt that pediatricians and audiologists should inform parents of genetic testing availability; however, there was no consensus on timing of this discussion. Thus culturally hearing parents do not perceive genetic testing of their deaf or hard-of-hearing infants/toddlers as harmful; they feel that primary care providers should discuss genetic testing with them; and positive genetic test results with genetic counseling give rise to better understanding and perceived benefit than negative or inconclusive results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.