Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19449173›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2009

Diagnostic concordance in reporting breast needle core biopsies using the B classification-A panel in Italy.

Simonetta Bianchi, Saverio Caini, Maria Grazia Cattani, Vania Vezzosi, Mauro Biancalani, Domenico Palli

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Simonetta BianchiDepartment of Human Pathology and Oncology, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy. simonetta.bianchi@unifi.it
Saverio Caini
Maria Grazia Cattani
Vania Vezzosi
Mauro Biancalani
Domenico Palli
Piedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale 11 di Empoli · ITOspedale Bellaria · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread implementation of mammography screening has resulted in an increased frequency of needle core biopsies (NCB). The aim of this study was that of evaluating the diagnostic reproducibility on breast NCB, according to the B-classification, among several pathologists from different Italian regions. Fifty single slides of NCBs performed for non palpable breast lesions were selected to evaluate the diagnostic reproducibility, according to the B classification, among 31 pathologists from different Italian areas, involved in the pathologic diagnosis of screen-detected breast lesions. According to the study majority diagnosis (MD), 21 cases were classified as B2 (benign lesion), 23 B3 (lesion of uncertain malignant potential) and 6 B5 (malignant lesion). Overall, individual kappa coefficients in comparison to MD were good (mean 0.61, range 0.31-0.88). The level of inter-observer agreement, however, appeared lower in differentiating the two intermediate categories B2 and B3, thus potentially leading to over-treatment (false-positives: 26%) or under-treatment (false-negatives: 17%) of individual patients. Specific sub-types of B3 need an improvement of the diagnostic definition. A multidisciplinary approach and consultation with expert colleagues are recommended.

Indexed as

Biopsy, NeedleBreastBreast NeoplasmsFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansItalyObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID19449173
OpenAlexW2074523783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.