ArticleBone marrow transplantation2010
Unrelated donor marrow transplantation in children: transplant policy and outcome in Leiden Paediatrics SCT-Centre.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Access to allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for patients with MDS or relapsed AML treated according to protocols of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group.Bone marrow transplantation · 2012Article
- Unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the pediatric population: single institution experience.Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transplant policy for unrelated donor (UD) BMT at Leiden Paediatrics' SCT-Centre consisted of the use of (1) fully HLA-matched donors or, if not available, HLA-class I matched and/or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursor (CTLp)-negative donors and (2) protective isolation of the recipient and antimicrobial suppression of his/her gut microflora to prevent infections and acute GVHD. Engraftment, GVHD, relapse in the case of malignancy and survival were studied retrospectively in 126 evaluable children, transplanted between 1988 and 2005. In addition to the effect of HLA-matching, that of other transplant-relevant variables on the outcome was also studied. Actuarial OS was 65% and the EFS was 59%, 13% graft failures occurred and 7.5% > or =grade II acute GVHD. HLA-class II mismatches combined with HLA-class I matches resulted in a superior OS of 92%, as did a negative vs positive CTLp test, that is, 65 vs 33%. Analysis of other variables showed a poorer OS in patients > or =10 yrs vs <10 yrs, that is, 54 vs 73%, and in male recipients of a female donor graft, that is, 53 vs 69% for other combinations. UD-BMT can be optimized by permitting HLA-class I-matched and/or CTLp-negative donors, and probably by choosing male donors for male recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.