Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19448680›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2010

Unrelated donor marrow transplantation in children: transplant policy and outcome in Leiden Paediatrics SCT-Centre.

J M Vossen, A E Donker, M B A Heemskerk, J L W Tj Lie, M H van Weel-Sipman, R G M Bredius, J D J Bakker, R M Egeler, M Oudshoorn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J M VossenDepartment of Paediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. J.Vossen@lumc.nl
A E Donker
M B A Heemskerk
J L W Tj Lie
M H van Weel-Sipman
R G M Bredius
J D J Bakker
R M Egeler
M Oudshoorn
Leiden University Medical Center · NLEuropdonor Foundation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transplant policy for unrelated donor (UD) BMT at Leiden Paediatrics' SCT-Centre consisted of the use of (1) fully HLA-matched donors or, if not available, HLA-class I matched and/or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursor (CTLp)-negative donors and (2) protective isolation of the recipient and antimicrobial suppression of his/her gut microflora to prevent infections and acute GVHD. Engraftment, GVHD, relapse in the case of malignancy and survival were studied retrospectively in 126 evaluable children, transplanted between 1988 and 2005. In addition to the effect of HLA-matching, that of other transplant-relevant variables on the outcome was also studied. Actuarial OS was 65% and the EFS was 59%, 13% graft failures occurred and 7.5% > or =grade II acute GVHD. HLA-class II mismatches combined with HLA-class I matches resulted in a superior OS of 92%, as did a negative vs positive CTLp test, that is, 65 vs 33%. Analysis of other variables showed a poorer OS in patients > or =10 yrs vs <10 yrs, that is, 54 vs 73%, and in male recipients of a female donor graft, that is, 53 vs 69% for other combinations. UD-BMT can be optimized by permitting HLA-class I-matched and/or CTLp-negative donors, and probably by choosing male donors for male recipients.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAdolescentBone Marrow TransplantationChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalGraft vs Host DiseaseHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansInfantMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNetherlandsHLA Antigens

Identifiers

PMID19448680
OpenAlexW2027372611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.