Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19448659›Full record

ReviewNature immunology2009

HIV-1 and influenza antibodies: seeing antigens in new ways.

Peter D Kwong, Ian A Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Outsmarting Pathogens with Antibody Engineering.Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Bos taurus ultralong CDR H3 antibodies.Current opinion in structural biology · 2016
    Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter D KwongVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. pdkwong@nih.gov
Ian A Wilson
National Institutes of Health · USScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Neutralization Mechanisms Of Anti-HIV-1 Monoclonal AntibodiesZIAAI005022 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI ZHOU, TONGQING · 2009 to 2025
$24.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New modes of humoral recognition have been identified by studies of antibodies that neutralize human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and influenza A viruses. Understanding how such modes of antibody-antigen recognition can occur in the context of sophisticated mechanisms of humoral evasion has implications for the development of effective vaccines. Here we describe eight modes of antibody recognition first observed with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Similarities to four of these modes have been identified with antibodies to a conserved 'stem' epitope on influenza A viruses. We outline how each of these different modes of antibody recognition is particularly suited to overcoming a specific viral evasion tactic and assess potential routes of re-elicitation in vaccine settings.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralAntigen-Antibody ReactionsHIV-1HIV AntigensHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesModels, BiologicalAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralHIV AntigensInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19448659
PMCPMC2796958
OpenAlexW2055253070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.