Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19448611›Full record

ArticleNature2009

dUTP incorporation into genomic DNA is linked to transcription in yeast.

Nayun Kim, Sue Jinks-Robertson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. An underlying mechanism for the increased mutagenesis of lagging-strand genes in Bacillus subtilis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nayun KimDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Sue Jinks-Robertson

Funding

REGULATION OF MITOTIC RECOMBINATION IN YEASTR01GM038464 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 1992 to 2015
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly activated transcription is associated with eukaryotic genome instability, resulting in increased rates of mitotic recombination and mutagenesis. The association between high transcription and genome stability is probably due to a variety of factors including an enhanced accumulation of DNA damage, transcription-associated supercoiling, collision between replication forks and the transcription machinery, and the persistence of RNA-DNA hybrids. In the case of transcription-associated mutagenesis, we previously showed that there is a direct proportionality between the level of transcription and the mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and that the molecular nature of the mutations is affected by highly activated transcription. Here we show that the accumulation of apurinic/apyrimidinic sites is greatly enhanced in highly transcribed yeast DNA. We further demonstrate that most apurinic/apyrimidinic sites in highly transcribed DNA are derived from the removal of uracil, the presence of which is linked to direct incorporation of dUTP in place of dTTP. These results show an unexpected relationship between transcription and the fidelity of DNA synthesis, and raise intriguing cell biological issues with regard to nucleotide pool compartmentalization.

Indexed as

MutationDeoxyuracil NucleotidesDNA, FungalGenome, FungalModels, GeneticMutagenesis, InsertionalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTranscription, GeneticDeoxyuracil Nucleotidesdeoxyuridine triphosphateDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID19448611
PMCPMC2730915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.