ReviewChest2009
Determination of the minimal clinically important difference scores for the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory symptom scale in two populations of patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection.
Review in Chest, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 186 papers, 66 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial With Aztreonam Lysinate for Inhalation in Cystic Fibrosis Patients With Pulmonary P. Aeruginosa Requiring Frequent Antibiotics (AIR-CF2)
Pragmatic Implementation Trial of a CF Primary Palliative Care Intervention
TAAI Erasmus Research Initiative to Fight CF: Monitoring Inflammation in CF Lung Disease Into a New Era
Who cites it
186 citing papers in PubMed, 66 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ivacaftor-tezacaftor-elexacaftor, tezacaftor-ivacaftor and lumacaftor-ivacaftor for treating cystic fibrosis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Antibiotic treatment for non-tuberculous mycobacteria lung infection in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Intravenous antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Bronchoscopy-guided antimicrobial therapy for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Macrolide antibiotics (including azithromycin) for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Corrector therapies (with or without potentiators) for people with cystic fibrosis with class II CFTR gene variants (most commonly F508del).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Nebuliser systems for drug delivery in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Prebiotics for people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions for improving adherence to airway clearance treatment and exercise in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Nebulised hypertonic saline for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Conventional chest physiotherapy compared to other airway clearance techniques for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Digital technology for early identification of exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Ataluren and similar compounds (specific therapies for premature termination codon class I mutations) for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Digital technology for monitoring adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Physical activity and exercise training in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Inhaled antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Short-acting inhaled bronchodilators for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Exercise versus airway clearance techniques for people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) is a validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) containing both generic scales and scales specific to cystic fibrosis (CF). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) score for a PRO corresponds to the smallest clinically relevant change a patient can detect. MCID scores for the CFQ-R respiratory symptom (CFQ-R-Respiratory) scale were determined using data from two 28 day, open-label, tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) studies in patients with CF and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection. At study enrollment, patients in the study 1-exacerbation had symptoms indicative of pulmonary exacerbation (n = 84; < 14 years of age, 31 patients; > or = 14 years of age, 53 patients); patients in study 2-stable had stable respiratory symptoms (n = 140; < 14 years of age, 14 patients; > or = 14 years, 126 patients).
methodsThe anchor-based method utilized a global rating-of-change questionnaire (GRCQ) that assessed patients' perceptions of change in their respiratory symptoms after TIS treatment. The mean change from baseline CFQ-R-Respiratory scores were mapped onto the GRCQ to estimate the MCID. The two distribution-based methods were as follows: (1) 0.5 SD of mean change in CFQ-R-Respiratory scores (baseline to end of TIS treatment); and (2) 1 SEM for baseline CFQ-R-Respiratory scores. Triangulation of these three estimates defined the MCIDs.
resultsMCID scores were larger for patients in study 1-exacerbation (8.5 points) than for those in study 2-stable (4.0 points), likely reflecting differences in patient disease status (exacerbation/stable) between these studies.
conclusionsPatient benefit from new and current CF therapies can be evaluated using changes in CFQ-R-Respiratory scores. Using the MCID provides a systematic way to interpret these changes, and facilitates the identification of CF treatments that improve both symptoms and physiologic variables, potentially leading to better treatment adherence and clinical outcomes. Trial registration (study 1-exacerbation): Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN 12605000602628 Trial registration (study 2-stable): ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00104520.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.