ArticleAtencion primaria2009
[Internet use by primary care and hospital doctors: perception of how it influences their relationships with patients].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Validity of the PEDOMETER® mobile application for evaluating cardiorespiratory fitness and fatigue resistance in cardiac rehabilitation. A pilot study].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2024Article
- Designing an Informative App for Neurorehabilitation: A Feasibility and Satisfaction Study by Physiotherapists.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of the Acceptability of ICT Use for Mental Health Care Questionnaire.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2022Article
- The influence of an educational internet-based intervention in the beliefs and attitudes of primary care professionals on non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol of a mixed methods approach.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- Article
- [Internet as an information source for health in primary care patients and its influence on the physician-patient relationship].Atencion primaria · 2013Article
- [Opinions of family doctors on the involvement of patients in the taking of decisions: a study with focus groups].Atencion primaria · 2012Article
- [Opinion of doctors and users on e-health advances in primary care].Atencion primariaArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare Internet use among physicians working in primary health care and hospitals and their perception of the influence this has on patient-doctor relationships.
designObservational descriptive study based on survey.
setting7 public hospitals (H) and 8 primary health care centres (PH) from Alicante, Madrid, Saragossa and Huesca.
participants685 physicians. 49.3% PH, 55.9% male, mean age: 43.2 years. MAIN ITEMS: How and for what is the Internet used on duty, advantages and disadvantages of Internet for medical-patient relationships.
resultsHospital MDs spend more time on the Internet (p<0.001), take more advantage of education resources (p<0.001) and collaborate more frequently with specific web sites (p=0.02). Both groups agree that the Internet leads to interaction with patients. Only 14% of the MDs had not received any questions regarding Internet information; 27.6% recommend websites to their patients; 30.8% considered that Internet use complicates medical-patient relationships. Its main advantage (42.2%) is support in getting to know the disease; 20.5% considers that it improves patient autonomy; 30.9% thinks that it undermines physician credibility.
conclusionsHospital MDs use the Internet more intensively. Both groups have the same opinion on the advantages of the Web resources for medical-patient relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.