Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19446927›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2009

[Internet use by primary care and hospital doctors: perception of how it influences their relationships with patients].

José Joaquín Mira Solves, Gilberto Llinás Santacreu, Susana Lorenzo Martínez, Carlos Aibar Remón

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

José Joaquín Mira SolvesUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Alicante, España. jose.mira@umh.es
Gilberto Llinás Santacreu
Susana Lorenzo Martínez
Carlos Aibar Remón

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare Internet use among physicians working in primary health care and hospitals and their perception of the influence this has on patient-doctor relationships.

designObservational descriptive study based on survey.

setting7 public hospitals (H) and 8 primary health care centres (PH) from Alicante, Madrid, Saragossa and Huesca.

participants685 physicians. 49.3% PH, 55.9% male, mean age: 43.2 years. MAIN ITEMS: How and for what is the Internet used on duty, advantages and disadvantages of Internet for medical-patient relationships.

resultsHospital MDs spend more time on the Internet (p<0.001), take more advantage of education resources (p<0.001) and collaborate more frequently with specific web sites (p=0.02). Both groups agree that the Internet leads to interaction with patients. Only 14% of the MDs had not received any questions regarding Internet information; 27.6% recommend websites to their patients; 30.8% considered that Internet use complicates medical-patient relationships. Its main advantage (42.2%) is support in getting to know the disease; 20.5% considers that it improves patient autonomy; 30.9% thinks that it undermines physician credibility.

conclusionsHospital MDs use the Internet more intensively. Both groups have the same opinion on the advantages of the Web resources for medical-patient relationships.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMedical Staff, HospitalPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleHumansInternetMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID19446927
PMCPMC7021929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.