ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology1991
Biphasic dose-response curves to arecoline in rat atria-mediation by a single promiscuous receptor or two receptor subtypes?
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of muscarinic receptors mediating relaxation and contraction in the rat iris dilator muscle.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Pertussis toxin-sensitive muscarinic relaxation in the rat iris dilator muscle.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Inhibitory effect of dithiothreitol on angiotensin II-induced contractions mediated by AT1-receptors in rat portal vein and rabbit aorta.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 1994Article
- The action of (+/-)L-660,863 [(+/-)3-(3-amino-1,2,4-oxadiazole-5-yl)-quinuclidine] at muscarinic receptor subtypes in vitro.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 1992Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arecoline produces a biphasic response in rat left atria, i.e., a depression of basal inotropy at low doses and a positive inotropic effect at higher doses. These present studies were designed to determine whether it can be shown that the two separate responses to arecoline are mediated by two distinct cell surface muscarinic receptors. The antagonists scopolamine, 4-DAMP and AF-DX 116 produced apparent simple competitive antagonism of the negative responses to arecoline. Schild analysis was used to measure the equilibrium dissociation constant of the antagonist-receptor complex for antagonism of this response to arecoline by these antagonists. In atria from rats treated with pertussis toxin, the negative inotropy to arecoline was abolished and only the positive inotropic effects were observed. The antagonism of the positive inotropic response to arecoline by these antagonists was studied separately in atria from rats treated with pertussis toxin by the Schild technique. The pKB estimates made from the Schild regressions indicated no evidence to suggest that the two responses to arecoline (negative and positive inotropy) were mediated by two separate receptors in rat left atria. These data are discussed in terms of a single muscarinic receptor in this tissue mediating these two responses by interaction with two G-proteins in the same cell membrane. These data also are discussed in terms of the use of agonist potency ratios for the classification of receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.