Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19446077›Full record

ReviewHormones and behavior2009

The organizational hypothesis and final common pathways: Sexual differentiation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system.

Nancy G Forger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hormones and behavior, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Location, location, location: genetic regulation of neural sex differences.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2012
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Sex differences in the brain: the not so inconvenient truth.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nancy G ForgerDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neuroendocrine Studies, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA 01003, USA. nforger@psych.umass.edu

Funding

Cell Death and Neural Sex DifferencesR01MH068482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FORGER, NANCY G · 2004 to 2013
$2.9M
Sexual Differentiation of the Nervous SystemK02MH072825 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FORGER, NANCY G · 2005 to 2009
$626k
MECHANISMS OF SEXUAL DIFFERENTIATION IN NERVOUS SYSTEMK02HD001188 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FORGER, NANCY G · 1997 to 2001
$144k
NICHD NIH HHS K02 HD001188NIMH NIH HHS K02 MH072825NIMH NIH HHS K02MH072825NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068482NIMH NIH HHS R01MH068482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In honor of the 50th anniversary of the "organizational hypothesis," this paper reviews work on sexual differentiation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system. Topics considered include the spinal nucleus of the bulbocavernosus, the ejaculation center, the cremaster nucleus, sensory and autonomic neurons, and pain. These relatively simple neural systems offer ample confirmation that early exposure to testicular hormones masculinizes the nervous system, including final common pathways. However, I also discuss findings that challenge, or at least stretch, the organizational hypothesis, with important implications for understanding sex differences throughout the nervous system.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansMaleMotor NeuronsNeural PathwaysPeripheral Nervous SystemSex DifferentiationSpinal CordGonadal Steroid Hormones

Identifiers

PMID19446077
PMCPMC2703449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.