Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1944607›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology1991

Phospholipase A2 and mediation of the activation of short-circuit current in the rat colonic mucosa.

M Diener, W Rummel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M DienerInstitut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Federal Republic of Germany.
W Rummel
Saarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melittin (0.5-2 micrograms ml-1) increased the short-circuit current (ISC) in mucosa-submucosa and mucosa preparations of the rat colon descendens in a dose-dependent manner. In the preparation with the submucosal plexus, quinacrine and indomethacin completely blocked the effect of melittin, indicating activation of phospholipase A2 and production of prostaglandins induced by the drug. The melittin response was also partially sensitive to the lipoxygenase inhibitor, nordihydroguaiaretic acid. Complete inhibition by tetrodotoxin and atropine gives evidence for the involvement of cholinergic neurons in the mediation of the response induced by melittin. In contrast, in the preparation without the submucosal plexus the effect of melittin was only partially inhibited by quinacrine, indomethacin, or by neuronal blockers, suggesting direct interactions of melittin with the epithelium in addition. The effect of melittin resembles to the action of bradykinin, which is neuronally mediated and quinacrine-sensitive in the mucosa-submucosa preparation, and quinacrine-resistant and not neuronally mediated in the mucosa preparation. In the mucosa-submucosa preparation, the melittin response is even partially sensitive to the bradykinin receptor antagonist [D-Phe7]-bradykinin. The results provide evidence for the presence of a quinacrine-sensitive phospholipase A2 in the preparation with and that without the submucosa.

Indexed as

AnimalsArachidonic AcidAtropineBradykininColforsinColonDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsFemaleIndomethacinIntestinal MucosaMasoprocolMelittenPhospholipases APhospholipases A2QuinacrineArachidonic AcidAtropineBradykininColforsinIndomethacinMasoprocolMelittenPhospholipases APhospholipases A2QuinacrineTetrodotoxin

Identifiers

PMID1944607
OpenAlexW2039766430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.