SynthesisBMJ clinical evidence2008
Perineal care.
Synthesis in BMJ clinical evidence, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported outcomes and outcome measures in childbirth perineal trauma research: a systematic review.International urogynecology journal · 2021Pooled it
- Antenatal perineal massage benefits in reducing perineal trauma and postpartum morbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International urogynecology journal · 2020Pooled it
- Birth-Related Perineal Trauma in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Maternal and child health journal · 2019Pooled it
- Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Impact of episiotomy on anal incontinence following second- to fourth-degree perineal tears-A cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Evaluating the prognostic association between race and perineal trauma: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- A Care Bundle Aiming to Reduce the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Survey of Women's Experiences.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- Article
- Diagnosis, management and training in perineal trauma: a UK national survey of obstetricians.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- The Use of Capacitive and Resistive Energy Transfer in Postpartum Pain Management in Women after Perineal Trauma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The Skin Antiseptic agents at Vaginal dElivery (SAVE) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Health care workers' perceptions of episiotomy in the era of respectful maternity care: a qualitative study of an obstetric training program in Mexico.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021Article
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: New Evidence and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Women's experiences of the OASI Care Bundle; a package of care to reduce severe perineal trauma.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Predictors of obstetric anal sphincter injury during waterbirth: a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study.International urogynecology journal · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOver 85% of women having a vaginal birth suffer some perineal trauma. Spontaneous tears requiring suturing are estimated to occur in at least a third of women in the UK and USA, with anal sphincter tears in 0.5% to 7% of women. Perineal trauma can lead to long-term physical and psychological problems. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of intrapartum surgical and non-surgical interventions on rates of perineal trauma? What are the effects of different methods and materials for primary repair of first- and second-degree tears and episiotomies? What are the effects of different methods and materials for primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (third- and fourth-degree tears)? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to April 2007 (BMJ Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
resultsWe found 38 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
conclusionsIn this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: active pushing, spontaneous pushing, and sustained breath-holding (Valsalva) method of pushing; continuous support during labour; conventional suturing; different methods and materials for primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries; episiotomies (midline and mediolateral incisions); epidural analgesia; forceps; methods of delivery ("hands-on" method, "hands poised"); water births; non-suturing of muscle and skin (or perineal skin alone); passive descent in the second stage of labour; positions (supine or lithotomy positions, upright position during delivery); restrictive or routine use of episiotomy; sutures (absorbable synthetic sutures, catgut sutures, continuous sutures, interrupted sutures); and vacuum extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19445799PMC2907946W4298858937What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.