ArticleBMC ecology2009
Life cycle and population growth rate of Caenorhabditis elegans studied by a new method.
Article in BMC ecology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aging-related behavioral defects in Caenorhabditis elegans.Biology open · 2026Article
- Quantifying Embryonic Lethality Rate in Caenorhabditis elegans.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026Article
- A Review of the Literature on the Endocrine Disruptor Activity Testing of Bisphenols inJournal of xenobiotics · 2026Review
- A proof-of-concept experimental-theoretical model to predict pesticide resistance evolution.Heredity · 2025Article
- Safety evaluation ofCurrent research in food science · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic Approaches to Investigate the Anti-Aging Effects of Blueberry Anthocyanins in a Caenorhabditis Elegans Aging Model.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Life history in Caenorhabditis elegans: from molecular genetics to evolutionary ecology.Genetics · 2024Review
- Biosafety evaluation of etoposide lipid nanomedicines in C. elegans.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Article
- Caenorhabditis elegans as an In Vivo Model Organism to Elucidate Teratogenic Effects.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Oleic Acid Metabolism in Response to Glucose inMetabolites · 2023Article
- ReducedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Allometric scaling of interspecific RNA transcript abundance to extend the use of metatranscriptomics in characterizing complex communities.Molecular ecology resources · 2023Article
- Genetic factors in methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity: What have we learned fromAdvances in neurotoxicology · 2023Article
- Zinc transporters ZIPT-2.4 and ZIPT-15 are required for normal C. elegans fecundity.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- The Modulatory Role of sti-1 in Methylmercury-Induced Toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans.Neurotoxicity research · 2022Article
- Cross-species metabolomic analysis of tau- and DDT-related toxicity.PNAS nexus · 2022Article
- Anthelmintic potency ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- Beneficial cumulative effects of old parental age on offspring fitness.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Measurement of the Effects of Metals on Taxis-to-Food Behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans.Current protocols · 2021Article
- Alternative Animal Models of Aging Research.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is the predominant model organism in biological research, being used by a huge number of laboratories worldwide. Many researchers have evaluated life-history traits of C. elegans in investigations covering quite different aspects such as ecotoxicology, inbreeding depression and heterosis, dietary restriction/supplement, mutations, and ageing. Such traits include juvenile growth rates, age at sexual maturity, adult body size, age-specific fecundity/mortality, total reproduction, mean and maximum lifespan, and intrinsic population growth rates. However, we found that in life-cycle experiments care is needed regarding protocol design. Here, we test a recently developed method that overcomes some problems associated with traditional cultivation techniques. In this fast and yet precise approach, single individuals are maintained within hanging drops of semi-fluid culture medium, allowing the simultaneous investigation of various life-history traits at any desired degree of accuracy. Here, the life cycles of wild-type C. elegans strains N2 (Bristol, UK) and MY6 (Münster, Germany) were compared at 20 degrees C with 5 x 10(9) Escherichia coli ml-1 as food source.
resultsHigh-resolution life tables and fecundity schedules of the two strains are presented. Though isolated 700 km and 60 years apart from each other, the two strains barely differed in life-cycle parameters. For strain N2 (n = 69), the intrinsic rate of natural increase (r m d(-1)), calculated according to the Lotka equation, was 1.375, the net reproductive rate (R 0) 291, the mean generation time (T) 90 h, and the minimum generation time (T min) 73.0 h. The corresponding values for strain MY6 (n = 72) were r m = 1.460, R0 = 289, T = 84 h, and T min = 67.3 h. Peak egg-laying rates in both strains exceeded 140 eggs d(-1). Juvenile and early adulthood mortality was negligible. Strain N2 lived, on average, for 16.7 d, while strain MY6 died 2 days earlier; however, differences in survivorship curves were statistically non-significant.
conclusionWe found no evidence that adaptation to the laboratory altered the life history traits of C. elegans strain N2. Our results, discussed in the light of earlier studies on C. elegans, demonstrate certain advantages of the hanging drop method in investigations of nematode life cycles. Assuming that its reproducibility is validated in further studies, the method will reduce the inter-laboratory variability of life-history estimates and may ultimately prove to be more convenient than the current standard methods used by C. elegans researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.