Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19445552›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2009

Premedication with sublingual morphine sulphate in abdominal surgery.

Laura Campiglia, Iacopo Cappellini, Guglielmo Consales, Tommaso Borracci, Luca Vitali, Elena Gallerani, Paolo Boninsegni, Rocco Domenico Mediati, Angelo Raffaele De Gaudio

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura CampigliaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Therapy, Misericordia and Dolce Hospital, Prato, Italy.
Iacopo Cappellini
Guglielmo Consales
Tommaso Borracci
Luca Vitali
Elena Gallerani
Paolo Boninsegni
Rocco Domenico Mediati
Angelo Raffaele De Gaudio
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITOspedale Misericordia e Dolce · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment with analgesics before surgery may be effective in reducing post-operative pain. This approach is defined as "pre-emptive analgesia" and recent reviews show conflicting results.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of pre-emptive analgesia with sublingual morphine sulphate, compared with sublingual midazolam in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery.

methodsPrior to surgery, 29 patients were randomized and premedicated with sublingual morphine sulphate 0.5 mg/kg (Group A; n = 15) or with sublingual midazolam 0.03 mg/kg (Group B; n = 14). General anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and fentanyl. Post-operatively, intravenous (IV) acetaminophen 0.02 mg/kg was given to all patients and a bolus of IV morphine 0.1 mg/kg was given to Group B patients. Post-operative pain was controlled by IV morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. IV acetaminophen 0.02 mg/kg was also administered four times daily. Efficacy was assessed using static Visual Analogue Scale (sVAS) scores, dynamic VAS (dVAS) scores, number of PCA doses administered and number of failed doses registered from the PCA device at 4, 6, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Results were statistically analysed using the Student t-test; a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsSignificantly lower sVAS and dVAS scores were observed in Group A patients than in Group B at all assessment periods (p < 0.05 for all time points). There were less PCA administered and failed doses in Group A, compared with Group B (all time points p < 0.05). There was no difference in the occurrence of common side effects between the two treatments.

conclusionsIn patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery, premedication with sublingual morphine sulphate results in a better control of post-operative pain, compared to premedication with sublingual midazolam. The beneficial effect of pre-operative sublingual morphine sulphate was apparent in the immediate post-operative period and was sustained over the 48-hour assessment period.

Indexed as

PremedicationAbdomenAdministration, SublingualAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidElective Surgical ProceduresHumansHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamMiddle AgedMorphinePostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamMorphine

Identifiers

PMID19445552
OpenAlexW1985980801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.