Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19445414›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Multivitamin use in pregnant and nonpregnant women: results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Kevin M Sullivan, Earl S Ford, M Fuad Azrak, Ali H Mokdad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A critical evaluation of prenatal supplements: Are they meeting the mark?Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin M SullivanDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. cdckms@sph.emory.edu
Earl S Ford
M Fuad Azrak
Ali H Mokdad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRelatively few studies have investigated characteristics associated with multivitamin use in pregnant women in the U.S. We examined multivitamin use among pregnant and nonpregnant women of childbearing age, in relation to socioeconomic factors, demographic data, health behaviors, and health status.

methodsThis investigation used 2004 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a cross-sectional study of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 years or older. Analyses were limited to women 18 to 44 years of age in states and territories where questions about multivitamin use were asked.

resultsOverall, 78% of pregnant women reported multivitamin use, compared with 47% of women who were not pregnant. Using logistic regression, two factors were found to be significantly associated with multivitamin use in pregnant women: income and marital status. Among nonpregnant women, the significant predictors were age, income, physical activity, education level, desire for a child in the near future, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and cigarette smoking status.

conclusionWe found differences in the reported use of multivitamins between pregnant and nonpregnant women of childbearing age as well as predictors of use.

Indexed as

PregnancyAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemBody Mass IndexEducational StatusEthnicityFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth StatusHumansIncomeMarital StatusMotor ActivitySmokingVitamins

Identifiers

PMID19445414
PMCPMC2663874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.