Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19444906›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2009

Prediagnostic circulating follicle stimulating hormone concentrations and ovarian cancer risk.

Meghan A McSorley, Anthony J Alberg, Diane S Allen, Naomi E Allen, Louise A Brinton, Joanne F Dorgan, Rudolf Kaaks, Sabina Rinaldi, Kathy J Helzlsouer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Lymphatic vasculature in ovarian cancer.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Association of Anti-Mullerian Hormone, Follicle-Stimulating Hormone, and Inhibin B with Risk of Ovarian Cancer in the Janus Serum Bank.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Meghan A McSorleyDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anthony J Alberg
Diane S Allen
Naomi E Allen
Louise A Brinton
Joanne F Dorgan
Rudolf Kaaks
Sabina Rinaldi
Kathy J Helzlsouer
Johns Hopkins University · USHeidelberg University · DEDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsFox Chase Cancer Center · USGuy's Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Hormone-Related CancersZIACP010126 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GIERACH, GRETCHEN · 2009 to 2025
$103.5M
CLUE STUDIES--EVALUATING BIOMARKERS OF CARCINOGENESISU01CA086308 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HELZLSOUER, KATHY J · 2000 to 2004
$4.2M
Androgens, Growth Factors, and Ovarian CancerR03CA097857 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HELZLSOUER, KATHY J · 2002 to 2003
$141k
NCI NIH HHS CA-86308NCI NIH HHS CA-97857NCI NIH HHS R03 CA097857NCI NIH HHS U01 CA086308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gonadotropins have been indicted in ovarian carcinogenesis but direct evidence has been limited and inconsistent. The aim of this study was to determine the association between prediagnostic levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and subsequent development of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. A nested case-control study was conducted using cases and controls drawn from three cohorts: CLUE I and CLUE II of Washington County, MD, and the Island of Guernsey Study, United Kingdom. In total, 67 incident invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases were each matched to 1 to 2 controls on age, menopausal status, time since last menstrual period, current hormone use and other relevant factors. FSH concentrations were classified into ranked thirds of low, medium or high based on the distribution among controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) across increasing thirds of FSH concentrations. Results of the analysis showed that ovarian cancer risk decreased with higher FSH concentrations (p-trend = 0.005). Compared with the lowest third of FSH concentrations, the OR among those in the middle and highest thirds were 0.45 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.20-1.00] and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.10-0.70), respectively. Associations persisted after excluding cases diagnosed within 5 years of follow-up. In conclusion, a reduction in subsequent risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer was observed among women with higher circulating FSH concentrations. These findings contradict the hypothesized role of FSH as a risk factor in ovarian carcinogenesis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansLogistic ModelsMarylandMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessOdds RatioOvarian NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorFollicle Stimulating Hormone

Identifiers

PMID19444906
PMCPMC2706295
OpenAlexW2024408861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.