Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19444515›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2009

Randomized controlled trial on sterile fluid collections management in acute pancreatitis: should they be removed?

Enver Zerem, Goran Imamovic, Safet Omerović, Bilal Imširović

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02648815 (Management of Moderate and Severe Forms of Acute Pancreatitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02648815 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Management of Moderate and Severe Forms of Acute Pancreatitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Clinical Center TuzlaRan2010 to 2017Enrolled100ConditionsPancreatitisArmsPercutaneous catheter drainage, Abdominal paracentesis evacuation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Catheter-Related Complications of Percutaneous Drainage in Step-up Approach for Management of Pancreatic Necrosis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Early predictors of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Minimally invasive treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Treatment of severe acute pancreatitis and its complications.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enver ZeremThe University Clinical Center Tuzla, Trnovac bb, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. zerem@inet.ba
Goran Imamovic
Safet Omerović
Bilal Imširović
University Clinical Center Tuzla · BAUniversity Clinical Hospital Mostar · BA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate if percutaneous drainage of sterile fluid collections recurring after initial aspiration in acute pancreatitis yields better results than their conservative management.

methodsFifty-eight patients with fluid collections in acute pancreatitis were followed up prospectively. Forty of them with sterile fluid collections that recurred after initial aspiration were randomly assigned to two groups of 20 in each. One group was initially treated with conservative management and the other group with prolonged catheter drainage. Patients with unsuccessful initial treatment were converted to more aggressive procedure. Outcome measure was conversion rate to more aggressive procedure.

resultsConversion to more aggressive procedure was done in 11 and 3 patients treated conservatively and with catheter drainage, respectively (p = 0.02). Four and 11 patients had bacterial colonization of their fluid collections in conservative management and drainage group, respectively (p = 0.048). Conservative treatment was successful in all six patients with sterile liquid collections < 30 ml. However, this treatment was unsuccessful in all seven patients with multiloculated and liquid collections >100 ml.

conclusionsProlonged catheter drainage is more efficient for management of recurrent sterile fluid collections in acute pancreatitis than is conservative treatment. Conservative treatment is successful for patients with small fluid collections.

Indexed as

Exudates and TransudatesAcute DiseaseAdultAgedBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCatheterizationDrainageFemaleHumansLongevityMaleMiddle AgedPancreatitisTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID19444515
OpenAlexW1982398904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.