Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2009
Effect of vitamin D supplementation in the institutionalized elderly.
Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Vitamin D Supplementation at a Dose of 10 µg/Day in Institutionalized Children with Severe Motor and Intellectual Disabilities.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Insufficiency of B vitamins with its possible clinical implications.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2020Review
- Efficacy of a Standardized Oral Vitamin D Dosing Regimen in Nursing Home Residents.Drugs & aging · 2018Article
- Vitamin D supplementation in older adults: searching for specific guidelines in nursing homes.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An intervention study with vitamin D supplementation was conducted in order to study the amount of vitamin D required in the elderly. Sixty-four institutionalized elderly were randomly assigned to two groups: group (A) to take a beverage containing 200 mg calcium daily, and group (B) to take a beverage containing 200 mg calcium and 5 microg vitamin D daily for 30 days. Prior to the study, the subjects' average vitamin D intake was 7.3 microg/day, which is approximately 150% of the current adequate intake (AI), however their mean plasma 25 OH-D level at baseline was only 12 ng/mL, strongly indicating hypovitaminosis D. During the study, average plasma 25 OH-D concentration significantly increased to 14.7 ng/mL in group (B), but not in group (A). However, group (B) was still in the hypovitaminosis range. Thus, daily intake exceeding the current AI of 5 microg is required for the institutionalized elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.