Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19444237›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2009

Preterm infants fed fortified human milk receive less protein than they need.

S Arslanoglu, G E Moro, E E Ziegler

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi-nutrient fortification of human milk for preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Dietary Protein Intake, Breast Feeding and Growth in Human Milk Fed Preterm Infants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Randomized trial of enteral protein and energy supplementation in infants less than or equal to 1250 g at birth.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2010
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Use of human milk and fortification in the NICU.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  16. Influence of maternal and perinatal factors on macronutrient content of very preterm human milk during the first weeks after birth.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

S ArslanogluDepartment of Neonatology, Center for Infant Nutrition, Macedonio Melloni Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. asertac@tiscali.it
G E Moro
E E Ziegler
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the actual nutrient intakes observed in a previously reported study with assumed nutrient intakes based on the customary assumptions about the composition of human milk. STUDY

designFortified human milk is assumed to provide adequate amounts of nutrients for premature infants. This assumption holds if milk has the composition of milk expressed by mothers of premature infants during weeks 2 to 3 of lactation. The assumption does not necessarily hold for milk expressed after 2 to 3 weeks lactation. It also does not hold for donor milk, which is typically provided by mothers of term infants. The size of the disparity between assumed and actual nutrient intakes is not known. Actual nutrient intakes were available for 32 preterm infants participating in the study. Assumed nutrient intakes were calculated for these infants by substituting assumed nutrient concentrations for observed nutrient concentrations. Data were compared separately for each of the 3 study weeks.

resultActual protein intakes were significantly and consistently lower than assumed protein intakes during each study week. The differences in mean intakes were large, ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 g kg(-1) per day. Differences in energy intake were small and not consistently significant.

conclusionActual intakes of protein by preterm infants fed fortified human milk are substantially lower than assumed intakes. The discrepancy may in part explain why preterm infants frequently show postnatal growth failure.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionFood, FortifiedDietary ProteinsEnergy IntakeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, PrematureMilk, HumanNutritive ValueDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19444237
OpenAlexW2085711298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.