Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19443788›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2009

Contingency management and motivational enhancement: a randomized clinical trial for college student smokers.

Tracy O'L Tevyaw, Suzanne M Colby, Jennifer W Tidey, Christopher W Kahler, Damaris J Rohsenow, Nancy P Barnett, Chad J Gwaltney, Peter M Monti

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Competitions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. The impact of incentives on exercise behavior: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Contingency Management for Drug Use Disorders: Meta-Analysis and Application of Tolin's Criteria.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tracy O'L TevyawVeterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Suzanne M Colby
Jennifer W Tidey
Christopher W Kahler
Damaris J Rohsenow
Nancy P Barnett
Chad J Gwaltney
Peter M Monti
Brown University · US

Funding

MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING FOR TEEN SMOKERS IN THE ERR01DA011204 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 1997 to 2006
$3.6M
NIDA NIH HHS DA011204NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe efficacy of contingency-management (CM) and motivational enhancement therapy (MET) for college student smoking cessation was examined.

methodsNontreatment-seeking daily smokers (N = 110) were randomly assigned to 3 weeks of CM versus noncontingent reinforcement (NR) and to three individual sessions of MET versus a relaxation control in a 2 x 2 experimental design. Expired carbon monoxide (CO) samples were collected twice daily for 3 weeks. Participants earned 5 US dollars for providing each sample; additionally, those randomized to CM earned escalating monetary rewards based on CO reductions (Week 1) and smoking abstinence (Weeks 2-3).

resultsCompared with NR, CM resulted in significantly lower CO levels and greater total and consecutive abstinence during the intervention. Those in the CM and MET groups reported greater interest in quitting smoking posttreatment, but rates of confirmed abstinence at follow-up were very low (4% at 6-month follow-up) and did not differ by group. DISCUSSION: Findings support the short-term efficacy of CM for reducing smoking among college students. Future research should explore enhancements to CM in this population, including a longer intervention period and the recruitment of smokers who are motivated to quit.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantToken EconomyAdultCombined Modality TherapyCounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMotivationReinforcement ScheduleSecondary PreventionSmokingSmoking CessationStudentsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID19443788
PMCPMC2688604
OpenAlexW2159281043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.