Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19443137›Full record

ReviewDrug and alcohol dependence2009

Principles of laboratory assessment of drug abuse liability and implications for clinical development.

Lawrence P Carter, Roland R Griffiths

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Inhalation of Alcohol Vapor: Measurement and Implications.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Detection of acute 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) effects across protocols using automated natural language processing.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. A window into the intoxicated mind? Speech as an index of psychoactive drug effects.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Electronic cigarettes: effective nicotine delivery after acute administration.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Trial
  17. Effects of varenicline on abstinence and smoking reward following a programmed lapse.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Trial
  18. Intranasal oxycodone self-administration in non-dependent opioid abusers.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2012
    Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lawrence P CarterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Psychiatric Research Institute-Center for Addiction Research, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States.
Roland R Griffiths
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

LICIT &ILLICIT ABUSED STIMULANT DRUGSR01DA003890 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, DUSTIN CLARK · 1985 to 2021
$8.0M
Human Clinical Pharmacology of Emerging Drugs of Abuse (Club Drugs)R01DA003889 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITHS, ROLAND R · 1985 to 2017
$7.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003889NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA03889NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA03890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abuse liability testing plays an important role in informing drug development, regulatory processes, and clinical practice. This paper describes the current "gold standard" methodologies that are used for laboratory assessments of abuse liability in non-human and human subjects. Particular emphasis is given to procedures such as non-human drug discrimination, self-administration, and physical dependence testing, and human dose-effect abuse liability studies that are commonly used in regulatory submissions to governmental agencies. The potential benefits and risks associated with the inclusion of measures of abuse liability in industry-sponsored clinical trials is discussed. Lastly, it is noted that many factors contribute to patterns of drug abuse and dependence outside of the laboratory setting and positive or negative signals in abuse liability studies do not always translate to high or low levels of actual abuse or dependence. Well-designed patient and physician education, pharmacovigilance, and postmarketing surveillance can reduce the diversion and misuse of drugs with abuse liability and can effectively foster the protection and promotion of public health.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavioral ResearchClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansRisk AssessmentSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID19443137
PMCPMC2763984
OpenAlexW2004030834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.