ArticleBMC public health2009
Will the NHS continue to function in an influenza pandemic? A survey of healthcare workers in the West Midlands, UK.
Article in BMC public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare workers' willingness to work during an influenza pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2015Pooled it
- Chapter 6. Protection of patients and staff during a pandemic. Recommendations and standard operating procedures for intensive care unit and hospital preparations for an influenza epidemic or mass disaster.Intensive care medicine · 2010Guideline
- Assessment of Physicians' Willingness to Work with Patients Not Yet Diagnosed with COVID-19 in a Romanian Sample.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Navigating a Pandemic: Leadership Dynamics and Challenges within Infection Prevention and Control Units in Israel.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Beliefs, attitudes and feelings about work among healthcare workers and teachers during the fifth wave of COVID-19.The Journal of international medical research · 2023Article
- The Role of Self-Efficacy and Risk Perception in the Willingness to Respond to Weather Disasters Among Emergency Medicine Health Care Workers in Pakistan.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2023Article
- Physicians' Trust in Relevant Institutions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Binary Logistic Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Willingness to Work during Public Health Emergencies: A Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Need for Psychological Support of Health Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Influence on Their Work.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- PPE fit of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.Applied ergonomics · 2022Article
- Article
- Factors Influencing Health Care Workers' Willingness to Respond to Duty during Infectious Disease Outbreaks and Bioterrorist Events: An Integrative Review.Prehospital and disaster medicine · 2021Review
- The Factors Affecting Volunteers' Willingness to Participate in Disaster Preparedness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Effective communication is key to intensive care nurses' willingness to provide nursing care amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.Intensive & critical care nursing · 2021Article
- Fighting against COVID-19: preparedness and implications on clinical practice in primary care in Shenzhen, China.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- [COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact and rapid reaction of Urology].Actas urologicas espanolas · 2020Review
- [COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact and rapid reaction of Urology].Actas urologicas espanolas · 2020Review
- Endourological Stone Management in the Era of the COVID-19.European urology · 2020Article
- Willingness of Chinese nurses to practice in Hubei combating the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic: A cross-sectional study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2020Article
- Taking control amidst the chaos: Emotion regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of vocational behavior · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIf UK healthcare services are to respond effectively to pandemic influenza, levels of absenteeism amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) must be minimised. Current estimates of the likelihood that HCWs will continue to attend work during a pandemic are subject to scientific and predictive uncertainty, yet an informed evidence base is needed if contingency plans addressing the issues of HCW absenteeism are to be prepared.
methodsThis paper reports the findings of a self-completed survey of randomly selected HCWs across three purposively sampled healthcare trusts in the West Midlands. The survey aimed to identify the factors positively or negatively associated with willingness to work during an influenza pandemic, and to evaluate the acceptability of potential interventions or changes to working practice to promote the continued presence at work of those otherwise unwilling or unable to attend. 'Likelihood' and 'persuadability' scores were calculated for each respondent according to indications of whether or not they were likely to work under different circumstances. Binary logistic regression was used to compute bivariate and multivariate odds ratios to evaluate the association of demographic variables and other respondent characteristics with the self-described likelihood of reporting to work.
resultsThe survey response rate was 34.4% (n = 1032). Results suggest absenteeism may be as high as 85% at any point during a pandemic, with potential absence particularly concentrated amongst nursing and ancillary workers (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.7 and 0.5; 95% CI 0.2 to 0.9 respectively).
conclusionLevels of absenteeism amongst HCWs may be considerably higher than official estimates, with potential absence concentrated amongst certain groups of employees. Although interventions designed to minimise absenteeism should target HCWs with a low stated likelihood of working, members of these groups may also be the least receptive to such interventions. Changes to working conditions which reduce barriers to the ability to work may not address barriers linked to willingness to work, and may fail to overcome HCWs' reluctance to work in the face of what may still be deemed unacceptable risk to self and/or family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.