Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19442077›Full record

ReviewCurrent clinical pharmacology2009

Pharmacological characteristics and clinical applications of K201.

Noboru Kaneko, Ryuko Matsuda, Yoshihito Hata, Ken Shimamoto

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current clinical pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Calmodulin Mutations in Human Disease.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mechanisms underlying pathological CaPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Targeting CaFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cardiac ryanodine receptor in metabolic syndrome: is JTV519 (K201) future therapy?Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noboru KanekoDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan. nkaneko@dokkyomed.ac.jp
Ryuko Matsuda
Yoshihito Hata
Ken Shimamoto
Dokkyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

K201 is a 1,4-benzothiazepine derivative that is a promising new drug with a strong cardioprotective effect. We initially discovered K201 as an effective suppressant of sudden cardiac cell death due to calcium overload. K201 is a non-specific blocker of sodium, potassium and calcium channels, and its cardioprotective effect is more marked than those of nicorandil, prazosine, propranolol, verapamil and diltiazem. Recently, K201 has also been shown to have activities indicated for treatment of atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, heart failure and ischemic heart disease, including action as a multiple-channel blocker, inhibition of diastolic Ca(2+) release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, suppression of spontaneous Ca(2+) sparks and Ca(2+) waves, blockage of annexin V and provision of myocardial protection, and improvement of norepinephrine-induced diastolic dysfunction. Here, we describe the pharmacological characteristics and clinical applications of K201.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCardiotonic AgentsCell DeathHeart DiseasesHumansSarcoplasmic ReticulumThiazepinesCalciumCardiotonic AgentsK201 compoundThiazepines

Identifiers

PMID19442077
PMCPMC2841427
OpenAlexW1979544826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.