Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19440530›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2009

Preventing smoking in young people: a systematic review of the impact of access interventions.

Lindsay Richardson, Natalie Hemsing, Lorraine Greaves, Sunaina Assanand, Patrice Allen, Lucy McCullough, Linda Bauld, Karin Humphries, Amanda Amos

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for tobacco use prevention in Indigenous youth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. E-Cigarette Use Among Never-Smoking California Students.American journal of public health · 2015
    Article
  13. Review
  14. A qualitative study of how young Scottish smokers living in disadvantaged communities get their cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Article
  15. Socioeconomic status and tobacco consumption among adolescents: a multilevel analysis of Argentina's Global Youth Tobacco Survey.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2012
    Article
  16. Research opportunities concerning youth and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lindsay RichardsonBritish Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada. linds321@hotmail.com
Natalie Hemsing
Lorraine Greaves
Sunaina Assanand
Patrice Allen
Lucy McCullough
Linda Bauld
Karin Humphries
Amanda Amos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo examine existing evidence on the effectiveness of interventions that are designed to prevent the illegal sale of tobacco to young people. The review considers specific sub-questions related to the factors that might influence effectiveness, any differential effects for different sub-populations of youth, and barriers and facilitators to implementation.

methodsA review of studies on the impact of interventions on young people under the age of 18 was conducted. It included interventions that were designed to prevent the illegal sale of tobacco to children and young people. The review was conducted in July 2007, and included 20 papers on access restriction studies. The quality of the papers was assessed and the relevant data was extracted.

resultsThe evidence obtained from the review indicates that access restriction interventions may produce significant reductions in the rate of illegal tobacco sales to youth. However, lack of enforcement and the ability of youth to acquire cigarettes from social sources may undermine the effectiveness of these interventions.

conclusionsWhen access interventions are applied in a comprehensive manner, they can affect young people's access to tobacco. However, further research is required to examine the effects of access restriction interventions on young people's smoking behaviour.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionSocial Control, FormalAdolescentCommerceHumansNicotianaAccess restrictionsillegal salespreventiontobaccoyouth

Identifiers

PMID19440530
PMCPMC2681197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.