Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19440284›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2009

Bacterial degradation of aromatic compounds.

Jong-Su Seo, Young-Soo Keum, Qing X Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Enhanced Biphenyl Degradation byMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  7. Breath volatile profiling reveals a diagnostic signature of MASLD in children.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jong-Su SeoDepartment of Molecular Biosciences and Bioengineering, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. jsseo@kitox.re.kr
Young-Soo Keum
Qing X Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aromatic compounds are among the most prevalent and persistent pollutants in the environment. Petroleum-contaminated soil and sediment commonly contain a mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heterocyclic aromatics. Aromatics derived from industrial activities often have functional groups such as alkyls, halogens and nitro groups. Biodegradation is a major mechanism of removal of organic pollutants from a contaminated site. This review focuses on bacterial degradation pathways of selected aromatic compounds. Catabolic pathways of naphthalene, fluorene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene, and benzo[a]pyrene are described in detail. Bacterial catabolism of the heterocycles dibenzofuran, carbazole, dibenzothiophene, and dibenzodioxin is discussed. Bacterial catabolism of alkylated PAHs is summarized, followed by a brief discussion of proteomics and metabolomics as powerful tools for elucidation of biodegradation mechanisms.

Indexed as

AerobiosisBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEnvironmental PollutantsHeterocyclic CompoundsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsProteomicsEnvironmental PollutantsHeterocyclic CompoundsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsbiodegradationBioremediationPAHspolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID19440284
PMCPMC2672333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.