Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19440234›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2009

p21 in cancer: intricate networks and multiple activities.

Tarek Abbas, Anindya Dutta

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,537 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,537citing papers in PubMed
47.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,537 citing papers in PubMed, 2,716 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. WEE1 opposes APC/CNature · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. SRSF3 plays a key role in liver cancer sex disparity by facilitating hepatocyte expression of ERα and FOXA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. p53 and p21 Status Influences Cellular Response to Metformin inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,477 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tarek AbbasDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, School of Medicine, 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. tabbas@virginia.edu
Anindya Dutta
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Cancer Research Training Program: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic StrategiesT32CA009109 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Andrew Carl Dudley, Melanie R Rutkowski · 1985 to 2026
$13.9M
ROLE OF CY MOTIFS IN SUBSTRATE RECOGNITION BY CDKSR01CA089406 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI DUTTA, ANINDYA · 2001 to 2011
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089406NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 89406NCI NIH HHS T32 CA 009109NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main engines that drives cellular transformation is the loss of proper control of the mammalian cell cycle. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 (also known as p21WAF1/Cip1) promotes cell cycle arrest in response to many stimuli. It is well positioned to function as both a sensor and an effector of multiple anti-proliferative signals. This Review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the regulation of p21 and its biological functions with emphasis on its p53-independent tumour suppressor activities and paradoxical tumour-promoting activities, and their implications in cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21HumansNeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID19440234
PMCPMC2722839
OpenAlexW2162262059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.