Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19440192›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2009

Balancing risk and reward: a rat model of risky decision making.

Nicholas W Simon, Ryan J Gilbert, Jeffrey D Mayse, Jennifer L Bizon, Barry Setlow

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk reshapes amygdala representation of choice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex differences in sensitivity to dopamine receptor manipulations of risk-based decision making in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas W SimonDepartment of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4235, USA.
Ryan J Gilbert
Jeffrey D Mayse
Jennifer L Bizon
Barry Setlow
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Research Training in Age-Related Cognitive DisordersT32AG027668 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARILYN S. ALBERT · 2007 to 2026
$6.3M
Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Decline in AgingR01AG029421 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIZON, JENNIFER LYNN · 2007 to 2018
$3.1M
Lasting Effects of Cocaine on Cognition and MotivationR03DA018764 · NIDA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI SETLOW, BARRY · 2004 to 2004
$73k
Long-Term Cocaine Effects on Impulsive Choice and Orbitofrontal Cortex ActivityF31DA023331 · NIDA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI SIMON, NICHOLAS W · 2008 to 2009
$59k
NIA NIH HHS AG029421NIA NIH HHS R01 AG029421NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027668NIDA NIH HHS DA018764NIDA NIH HHS DA023331NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA023331NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA018764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a behavioral task in rats to assess the influence of risk of punishment on decision making. Male Long-Evans rats were given choices between pressing a lever to obtain a small, 'safe' food reward and a large food reward associated with risk of punishment (footshock). Each test session consisted of 5 blocks of 10 choice trials, with punishment risk increasing with each consecutive block (0, 25, 50, 75, 100%). Preference for the large, 'risky' reward declined with both increased probability and increased magnitude of punishment, and reward choice was not affected by the level of satiation or the order of risk presentation. Performance in this risky decision-making task was correlated with the degree to which the rats discounted the value of probabilistic rewards, but not delayed rewards. Finally, the acute effects of different doses of amphetamine and cocaine on risky decision making were assessed. Systemic amphetamine administration caused a dose-dependent decrease in choice of the large risky reward (ie, it made rats more risk averse). Cocaine did not cause a shift in reward choice, but instead impaired the rats' sensitivity to changes in punishment risk. These results should prove useful for investigating neuropsychiatric disorders in which risk taking is a prominent feature, such as attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and addiction.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalRewardRisk-TakingAmphetamineAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiophysicsCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineConditioning, OperantDecision MakingDopamine Uptake InhibitorsElectroshockMaleProbability LearningAmphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineDopamine Uptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID19440192
PMCPMC2726909
OpenAlexW2080142950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.