ArticleGenome research2009
Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines.
Article in Genome research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 231 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
231 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Calibrating and documenting host-switching and evolution of incompatibility loci for two closely related Wolbachia clades.Genetics · 2026Article
- How Did a Size-Divergent Water Strider Species Group Exhibiting an East Asia-Eastern North America Disjunction Originate and Diversify?Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Phylogeographic history of the ring distribution inZoological research · 2026Article
- Developmental speed and chronological time exert opposing effects on the spontaneous mutation rate inEvolution letters · 2026Article
- Interpreting GC content differences across populations at polymorphic sites.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Transposable elements contribute substantially to naturally occurring genetic lethality in Drosophila melanogaster.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Co-evolving infectivity and expression patterns drive the diversification of endogenous retroviruses.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- Calibrating and documenting host-switching and evolution of incompatibility loci for two closely relatedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Spontaneous Mutations Occur More in Highly Transcribed Regions in Daphnia.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Trio-sequencing Reveals High Germline Mutation Rates in the Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata).Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic signatures of rapid local selection and introgression drive adaptive phylogeography in the European river skater.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Genetic differentiation in domesticated black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) populations.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Timing and Pattern of Early Diversification in Drosophilidae (Diptera).Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- The mutation landscape ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Unexpectedly low recombination rates and presence of hotspots in termite genomes.Genome research · 2025Article
- Spontaneous and environment induced genomic alterations in yeast model.Cell insight · 2025Review
- The Genome Architecture of the Copepod Eurytemora carolleeae - the Highly Invasive Atlantic Clade of the Eurytemoraaffinis Species Complex.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2024Article
- What can we infer about mutation calling by using time-series mutation accumulation data and a Bayesian Mutation Finder?Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Population genomics of seal lice provides insights into the postglacial history of northern European seals.Molecular ecology · 2024Article
171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We inferred the rate and properties of new spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster by carrying out whole-genome shotgun sequencing-by-synthesis of three mutation accumulation (MA) lines that had been maintained by close inbreeding for an average of 262 generations. We tested for the presence of new mutations by generating alignments of each MA line to the D. melanogaster reference genome sequence and then compared these alignments base by base. We determined empirically that at least five reads at a site within each line are required for accurate single nucleotide mutation calling. We mapped a total of 174 single-nucleotide mutations, giving a single nucleotide mutation rate of 3.5 x 10(-9) per site per generation. There were no false positives in a random sample of 40 of these mutations checked by Sanger sequencing. Variation in the numbers of mutations among the MA lines was small and nonsignificant. Numbers of transition and transversion mutations were 86 and 88, respectively, implying that transition mutation rate is close to 2x the transversion rate. We observed 1.5x as many G or C --> A or T as A or T --> G or C mutations, implying that the G or C --> A or T mutation rate is close to 2x the A or T --> G or C mutation rate. The base composition of the genome is therefore not at an equilibrium determined solely by mutation. The predicted G + C content at mutational equilibrium (33%) is similar to that observed in transposable element remnants. Nearest-neighbor mutational context dependencies are nonsignificant, suggesting that this is a weak phenomenon in Drosophila. We also saw nonsignificant differences in the mutation rate between transcribed and untranscribed regions, implying that any transcription-coupled repair process is weak. Of seven short indel mutations confirmed, six were deletions, consistent with the deletion bias that is thought to exist in Drosophila.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.