Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19439461›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2009

Dieting, restraint, and disinhibition predict women's weight change over 6 y.

Jennifer S Savage, Lesa Hoffman, Leann L Birch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Validation of the Flexible and Rigid Cognitive Restraint Scales in a General French Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Psychopathology, disordered eating, and impulsivity as predictors of outcomes of bariatric surgery.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer S SavageCenter for Childhood Obesity Research, Department of Nutritional Sciences and Human Development and Family Studies, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Lesa Hoffman
Leann L Birch
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

EARLY DIETING IN GIRLSR01HD032973 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI BIRCH, LEANN L. · 1996 to 2005
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS HD 32973NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD032973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough disinhibited eating is positively associated with higher weight in women, it is not known whether restrained eating and dieting moderate the influence of disinhibited eating on weight change.

objectiveThe objective was to investigate over 6 y the interactive effects of restrained and disinhibited eating and self-reported dieting to lose weight as predictors of weight gain in women.

designData were collected from non-Hispanic white women (n = 163) every 2 y. Height and weight were measured in triplicate. Dietary restraint and disinhibition were assessed by using the Eating Inventory. Participants were also asked if they were "currently dieting to lose weight." Multilevel modeling was used to examine change in weight as a function of time-invariant and time-varying predictors, including dietary restraint, dietary disinhibition, and self-reported dieting.

resultsAfter covariates were adjusted for, growth curve models showed that within-person increases in restraint over time were associated with concurrent decreases in weight and that higher levels of restraint moderated the positive association between dietary disinhibition and weight. Women who reported dieting at study entry were heavier at study entry and gained more weight over time than did nondieters. Finally, a significant interaction between restraint, disinhibition, and dieting showed that restraint moderated the effect of disinhibition on weight differently in nondieters than in dieters.

conclusionsIncreasing levels of dietary restraint may be beneficial in moderating weight by attenuating the positive association between disinhibition and weight in dieting women. An understanding of weight and weight change requires examination of the interactive effects of restraint, disinhibition, and dieting.

Indexed as

Diet, ReducingFeeding BehaviorAdultBody Mass IndexBody WeightEmploymentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesForecastingHealth StatusHumansIncomeMiddle AgedOverweightPersonality InventoryPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID19439461
PMCPMC2696993
OpenAlexW2111770104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.