ArticleTexas Heart Institute journal2009
Clinical predictors of late death in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Texas Heart Institute journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Competing Risks of Cardiovascular Versus Noncardiovascular Death During Long-Term Follow-Up After Acute Coronary Syndromes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Trial
- Complication during transportation and 30 days mortality of patients with acute coronary syndrome.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Article
- Magnitude and Characteristics of Patients Who Survived an Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Observational
- Prognostic Value of Circulating Inflammatory Cells in Patients with Stable and Acute Coronary Artery Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Survivors of acute myocardial infarction have higher mortality rates than do the general population. This study examined the value of multiple clinical characteristics in predicting late death among patients who present with acute myocardial infarction.We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who had been treated for acute myocardial infarction at our institution from 1992 through 2000. We abstracted the clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and treatment characteristics.Of 144 patients (79.2% men; 97.2% white; mean age, 63 +/- 14.2 yr) included in this analysis, 63 (43.8%) patients died during a follow-up period of 5.6 +/- 2.8 years (5 d-12.7 yr). Higher age (hazard ratio, 1.83 +/- 0.31 for every 10-year increase), elevated serum creatinine (hazard ratio, 2.87 +/- 0.76), and lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (hazard ratio, 0.74 +/- 0.21 for every 5% increase) were found to be predictors of late death after adjusting for the white blood cell count, the QRS duration, the presence of coronary revascularization or defibrillator implantation, and the history of coronary artery disease. Elevated white blood cell count predicted early but not late death. Patients with none of the above risk factors had 100% survival at 5 years, in comparison with 22.7% survival for those with 3 or more of the 4 risk factors identified above.In this study, we have identified clinical predictors of long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction that might help in prognostication, patient education, and risk modification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19436782PMC2676527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.