ArticleEplasty2009
Beyond wet-to-dry: a rational approach to treating chronic wounds.
Article in Eplasty, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- In situ Formation of Polymer Microparticles in Bacterial Nanocellulose Using Alternative and Sustainable Solvents to Incorporate Lipophilic Drugs.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Bacterial Cellulose: Functional Modification and Wound Healing Applications.Advances in wound care · 2021Article
- Integrated Management of Skin NTDs-Lessons Learned from Existing Practice and Field Research.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2018Review
- The Application of Modern Dressings to Buruli Ulcers: Results from a Pilot Implementation Project in Ghana.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016Article
- Cytokine-Rich Adipose Tissue Extract Production from Water-Assisted Lipoaspirate: Methodology for Clinical Use.BioResearch open access · 2016Article
- Wound care in Buruli ulcer disease in Ghana and Benin.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2014Article
- Wet-to-Dry Dressings Do Not Provide Moist Wound Healing.The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis article reviews the current recommendations for the classification and treatment of chronic wounds. With a rational approach and a thorough understanding of available treatment options, plastic surgeons can provide better-quality and more cost-effective wound care.
methodsThe authors reviewed the literature on the history of wound care and on recent advancements in wound care and also summarized the current clinical practices of the Johns Hopkins Wound Center.
resultsn/a.
conclusionsOptimized wound dressings decrease pain, diminish morbidity, and improve healing times.
Identifiers
19436765PMC2680240W249442357What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.