ArticleHFSP journal2008
Characterization of the unfolded state of repeat proteins.
Article in HFSP journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The unfolded state ensemble of proteins has been described as a structurally featureless state. While this approach is supported by the fact that many unfolded proteins follow the scaling law behavior of a random coil, there is evidence that the unfolded states of various proteins are stabilized by native or non-native interactions. Recently, the existence of extensive non-native structure was reported for a repeat protein, which resulted in a scaling law exponent that is significantly smaller than that of a random polymer [Cortajarena et al., J. Mol. Biol. 382(1), 203-212 (2008)]. It was concluded that the high compactness of this protein stems from a significant fraction of interacting PP(II) helical segments in the unfolded state. In this study, we aim at providing possible molecular understanding of this anomalous compactness of the unfolded state and to investigate its origin. Using a hierarchy of computational models, we ask whether in general the unfolded state of a repeat protein is likely to be intrinsically more compact than the unfolded state of globular proteins, or whether this phenomenon depends mostly on the occurrence of a specific sequence that promotes PP(II) conformations. Our results suggest that the formation of the PP(II) conformation is indeed essential, yet the recurring sequence of repeat proteins promotes the interactions between these PP(II) segments and the formation of non-native interactions in the unfolded state.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.