Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19436297›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2009

Follow-up care for men with prostate cancer and the role of primary care: a systematic review of international guidelines.

H M McIntosh, R D Neal, P Rose, E Watson, C Wilkinson, D Weller, C Campbell, Prostate Cancer Follow-up Group

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring the experiences of patients, general practitioners and oncologists of prostate cancer follow-up: A qualitative interview study.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Comparing the costs of three prostate cancer follow-up strategies: a cost minimisation analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

H M McIntoshCommunity Health Sciences - General Practice, University of Edinburgh, 20 West Richmond Street, Edinburgh EH9 9DX, UK. heather.mcintosh@ed.ac.uk
R D Neal
P Rose
E Watson
C Wilkinson
D Weller
C Campbell
Prostate Cancer Follow-up Group

Funding

Cancer Research UK C12357/ A7536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal role for primary care in providing follow-up for men with prostate cancer is uncertain. A systematic review of international guidelines was undertaken to help identify key elements of existing models of follow-up care to establish a theoretical basis for evaluating future complex interventions. Many guidelines provide insufficient information to judge the reliability of the recommendations. Although the PSA test remains the cornerstone of follow-up, the diversity of recommendations on the provision of follow-up care reflects the current lack of research evidence on which to base firm conclusions. The review highlights the importance of transparent guideline development procedures and the need for robust primary research to inform future evidence-based models of follow-up care for men with prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAftercareFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternational AgenciesMalePractice Guidelines as TopicProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19436297
PMCPMC2714251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.