Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19434667›Full record

ArticleCancer2009

Rural reversal? Rural-urban disparities in late-stage cancer risk in Illinois.

Sara McLafferty, Fahui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Geographic Access to Mammography and Its Relationship to Breast Cancer Screening and Stage at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Pooled it
  4. Blue nevus-like melanoma: A rare entity.Dermatology online journal · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Same People, Different Results: Categorizing Cancer Registry Cases Across the Rural-Urban Continuum.WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Disparities in cancer incidence by rurality in California.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara McLaffertyDepartment of Geography, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA. smclaff@illinois.edu
Fahui Wang

Funding

Late-Stage Cancer Clusters and Healthcare AccessR21CA114501 · NCI · NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, FAHUI · 2005 to 2006
$205k
NCI NIH HHS 1-R21-CA114501-01NCI NIH HHS R21 CA114501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferences in late-stage cancer risk between urban and rural residents are a key component of cancer disparities. Using data from the Illinois State Cancer Registry from 1998 through 2002, the authors investigated the rural-urban gradient in late-stage cancer risk for 4 major types of cancer: breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate.

methodsMultilevel modeling was used to evaluate the role of population composition and area-based contextual factors in accounting for rural-urban variation. Instead of a simple binary rural-urban classification, a finer grained classification was used that differentiated the densely populated City of Chicago from its suburbs and from smaller metropolitan areas, large towns, and rural settings.

resultsFor all 4 cancers, the risk was highest in the most highly urbanized area and decreased as rurality increases, following a J-shaped progression that included a small upturn in risk in the most isolated rural areas. For some cancers, these geographic disparities were associated with differences in population age and race; for others, the disparities remained after controlling for differences in population composition, zip code socioeconomic characteristics, and spatial access to healthcare.

conclusionsThe observed pattern of urban disadvantage emphasized the need for more extensive urban-based cancer screening and education programs.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID19434667
PMCPMC2774239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.