Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19434387›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction2009

Long-term outcomes of TVT and IVS operations for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: monofilament vs. multifilament polypropylene tape.

Jens Christian Prien-Larsen, Lars Hemmingsen

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jens Christian Prien-LarsenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Nykobing Falster Hospital, Fjordvej 15, 4800, Nykobing Falster, Denmark. jcpr@regionsjaelland.dk
Lars Hemmingsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisWe compared cure rates of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) with intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) and evaluated changes in cure rates over time.

methodsOne hundred three underwent TVT and 213 underwent IVS. Follow-ups were done at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years.

resultsThe following results were found: objective cure for TVT 98-95-94% vs. IVS 86-86-80% (p < 0.03); subjective cure for TVT 82-79-74% vs. IVS 79-81-71% (NS). In IVS, a significant decline in subjective cure took place. Vaginal erosions were found in 11.8% of women in the IVS group and none in the TVT group.

conclusionsTVT is an effective and stable treatment, whereas IVS has a significant inferior objective cure rate, and a significant decline in subjective cure rate occurred over time. A high rate of vaginal erosions was found in the IVS group. We cannot recommend the use of multifilament polypropylene tape (IVS) for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDevice RemovalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPolypropylenesProsthesis ImplantationSuburethral SlingsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressVaginal DiseasesPolypropylenes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.