Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19434078›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2009

Towards better mouse models: enhanced genotypes, systemic phenotyping and envirotype modelling.

Johannes Beckers, Wolfgang Wurst, Martin Hrabé de Angelis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Zebrafish and Flavonoids: Adjuvants against Obesity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Enviromics in breeding: applications and perspectives on envirotypic-assisted selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Animal models of obesity and diabetes mellitus.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. INFRAFRONTIER: a European resource for studying the functional basis of human disease.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes BeckersInstitute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, GmbH, Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. beckers@helmholtz-muenchen.de
Wolfgang Wurst
Martin Hrabé de Angelis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse is the leading mammalian model organism for basic genetic research and for studying human diseases. Coordinated international projects are currently in progress to generate a comprehensive map of mouse gene functions - the first for any mammalian genome. There are still many challenges ahead to maximize the value of the mouse as a model, particularly for human disease. These involve generating mice that are better models of human diseases at the genotypic level, systemic (assessing all organ systems) and systematic (analysing all mouse lines) phenotyping of existing and new mouse mutant resources, and assessing the effects of the environment on phenotypes.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalPhenotypeAnimalsDatabases, GeneticEnvironmental ExposureGenotypeHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID19434078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.