Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19434077›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2009

Detecting gene-gene interactions that underlie human diseases.

Heather J Cordell

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 679 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
679citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
74.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

679 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,370 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Association ofAnnals of medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Interaction between smoking andMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

619 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather J CordellInstitute of Human Genetics, Newcastle University, International Centre for Life, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK. heather.cordell@ncl.ac.uk
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 074524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the identification of several disease-associated polymorphisms by genome-wide association (GWA) analysis, interest is now focusing on the detection of effects that, owing to their interaction with other genetic or environmental factors, might not be identified by using standard single-locus tests. In addition to increasing the power to detect associations, it is hoped that detecting interactions between loci will allow us to elucidate the biological and biochemical pathways that underpin disease. Here I provide a critical survey of the methods and related software packages currently used to detect the interactions between genetic loci that contribute to human genetic disease. I also discuss the difficulties in determining the biological relevance of statistical interactions.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumans

Identifiers

PMID19434077
PMCPMC2872761
OpenAlexW2063575312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.